ArticleFrontiers in immunology2020
An Analytically and Diagnostically Sensitive RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR Protocol for Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Direct Cell-to-PCR Lysis Buffer Using Optimized Non-Ionic Detergents for RNA-Extraction-Free RT-qPCR.Methods and protocols · 2026Article
- Chitosan-curcumin nanoparticles: a potential nano-therapeutic for cognitive restoration in a streptozotocin-induced rat model of Alzheimer's disease.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Article
- Integrative Methylome and Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Epigenetic Regulation of Pigmentation in Oujiang Color Common Carp.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Differential reactivity of SARS-CoV-2 S-protein T-cell epitopes in vaccinated versus naturally infected individuals.Clinical & translational immunology · 2025Article
- Insights into non-coding RNAS: biogenesis, function and their potential regulatory roles in acute kidney disease and chronic kidney disease.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025Review
- Three-way junction structure-mediated reverse transcription-free exponential amplification reaction for pathogen RNA detection.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Technical pitfalls when collecting, cryopreserving, thawing, and stimulating human T-cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Evaluating the stability of host-reference gene expression and simultaneously quantifying parasite burden and host immune responses in murine malaria.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Effect of Tropical Temperatures on the Quality of RNA Extracted from Stabilized Whole-Blood Samples.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Multiplex Microsphere PCR (mmPCR) Allows Simultaneous Gram Typing, Detection of Fungal DNA, and Antibiotic Resistance Genes.Laboratory medicine · 2022Article
- A high-throughput screening RT-qPCR assay for quantifying surrogate markers of immunity from PBMCs.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Article
- Nitrogen fertilizer rate but not form affects the severity of Fusarium wilt in banana.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliable extraction and sensitive detection of RNA from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is critical for a broad spectrum of immunology research and clinical diagnostics. RNA analysis platforms are dependent upon high-quality and high-quantity RNA; however, sensitive detection of specific responses associated with high-quality RNA extractions from human samples with limited PBMCs can be challenging. Furthermore, the comparative sensitivity between RNA quantification and best-practice protein quantification is poorly defined. Therefore, we provide herein a critical evaluation of the wide variety of current generation of RNA-based kits for PBMCs, representative of several strategies designed to maximize sensitivity. We assess these kits with a reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay optimized for both analytically and diagnostically sensitive cell-based RNA-based applications. Specifically, three RNA extraction kits, one post-extraction RNA purification/concentration kit, four SYBR master-mix kits, and four reverse transcription kits were tested. RNA extraction and RT-qPCR reaction efficiency were evaluated with commonly used reference and cytokine genes. Significant variation in RNA expression of reference genes was apparent, and absolute quantification based on cell number was established as an effective RT-qPCR normalization strategy. We defined an optimized RNA extraction and RT-qPCR protocol with an analytical sensitivity capable of single cell RNA detection. The diagnostic sensitivity of this assay was sufficient to show a CD8
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.