Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32265794›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

The Influence of Match Status on Ball Possession in High Performance Women's Football.

Rubén Maneiro, José L Losada, Claudio A Casal, Antonio Ardá

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. High Levels of PM10 Reduce the Physical Activity of Professional Soccer Players.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Identification of Explanatory Variables in Possession of the Ball in High-Performance Women's Football.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rubén ManeiroDepartment of Science of Physical Activity and Sport, Pontifical University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
José L LosadaDepartment of Methodology of Behavioral Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Claudio A CasalDepartment of Science of Physical Activity and Sport, Catholic University of Valencia "San Vicente Mártir", Valencia, Spain.
Antonio ArdáDepartment of Physical and Sport Education, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the effect of the situational match status variable on the ball possession of the teams that participated in the 2015 FIFA Women's World Cup. The 52 games played during the championship have been collected, and 3,740 ball possessions made by the teams were analyzed. The teams have been divided into successful and unsuccessful. Three types of analysis have been carried out: a univariate analysis for both groups with the categorical and continuous variables selected; a bivariate analysis, using chi-square tests and the exact Fischer test; and finally, a multivariable technique such as the decision trees was incorporated. The available results show significant differences between the two groups considered. Specifically, there are significant differences between winning and losing teams in terms of match status. The results of the

Indexed as

ball possessiondecision treesmatch statusperformance analysissituational variableswomen’s football

Identifiers

PMID32265794
PMCPMC7104793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.