ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
Country and Sex Differences in Decision Making Under Uncertainty and Risk.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- From Gender Threat to Farsightedness: How Women's Perceived Intergroup Threat Shapes Their Long-Term Orientation.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- "Cool" and "Hot" executive functions in deaf children: the executive brain battery (EBB).Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2025Article
- Cross-species comparison of rodent and human decision-making in the Iowa Gambling Task in select neurological and psychiatric disorders: translational approach to examine age- and sex-specific effects of stress and corticolimbic perturbations.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Methamphetamine increases risky choice in rats, but only when magnitude and probability of reinforcement are manipulated within a session.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2024Article
- Personal determinants of change agents' decision-making behavior in community health promotion: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Bittersweet memories and somatic marker hypothesis: adaptive control in emotional recall facilitates long-term decision-making in the Iowa Gambling Task.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- The Prominent Deck B Phenomenon in Schizophrenia: An Empirical Study on Iowa Gambling Task.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Role of Cortisol and Testosterone in Risky Decision-Making: Deciphering Male Decision-Making in the Iowa Gambling Task.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Functional Cerebral Specialization and Decision Making in the Iowa Gambling Task: A Single-Case Study of Left-Hemispheric Atrophy and Hemispherotomy.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whether males and females differ in decision-making remains highly debatable. However, a male advantage in decision making is observed in animal as well as human models of the iowa gambling task (IGT), and, in case of the latter, the difference is observed across a wide range of age groups. It is unclear if these sex differences on the IGT are malleable to environmental influences such as sociocultural factors. We tested sex differences during the uncertainty and risk phases of the IGT in data pooled from three countries that reflected high, moderate, to low gender-equity (Germany, United States, and India:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.