Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32265721›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020

Electrospun Nanofiber Meshes With Endometrial MSCs Modulate Foreign Body Response by Increased Angiogenesis, Matrix Synthesis, and Anti-Inflammatory Gene Expression in Mice: Implication in Pelvic Floor.

Shayanti Mukherjee, Saeedeh Darzi, Kallyanashis Paul, Fiona L Cousins, Jerome A Werkmeister, Caroline E Gargett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Platelet-Rich Plasma and Fractional COInternational urogynecology journal · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Endometrial SUSD2Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shayanti MukherjeeThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Saeedeh DarziThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Kallyanashis PaulThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Fiona L CousinsThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Jerome A WerkmeisterThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Caroline E GargettThe Ritchie Centre, Hudson Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Monash University · AUHudson Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTransvaginal meshes for the treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP) have been associated with severe adverse events and have been banned for clinical use in many countries. We recently reported the design of degradable poly L-lactic acid-co-poly ε-caprolactone nanofibrous mesh (P nanomesh) bioengineered with endometrial mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (eMSC) for POP repair. We showed that such bioengineered meshes had high tissue integration as well as immunomodulatory effects

methodsSUSD2

resultsBioengineered P nanomesh/eMSC constructs explanted after 6 weeks showed significant increase in 35 genes associated with ECM, ECM regulation, cell adhesion angiogenesis, and immune response in comparison to P nanomesh alone. In the absence of eMSC, acute inflammatory genes were significantly elevated at 1 week. However, in the presence of eMSC, there was an increased expression of anti-inflammatory genes including

conclusionThis study reveals that eMSC modulate the foreign body response to degradable P nanomeshes

Indexed as

electrospinningforeign body giant cellsforeign body responsegene expressionmesenchymal stem cellsnanofiber meshpelvic organ prolapsetissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID32265721
PMCPMC7107042
OpenAlexW3012958072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.