Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32265632›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2020

Mouse Navigation Strategies for Odor Source Localization.

Annie Liu, Andrew E Papale, James Hengenius, Khusbu Patel, Bard Ermentrout, Nathan N Urban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Fly navigational responses exploit plume-specific odor motion and gradient cues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Mice navigate scent trails using predictive policies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Olfactory search with finite-state controllers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Olfactory Sensing and Navigation in Turbulent Environments.Annual review of condensed matter physics · 2022
    Article
  14. Active sensing in a dynamic olfactory world.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Olfactory tracking strategies in a neotropical fruit bat.The Journal of experimental biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annie LiuDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Andrew E PapaleDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
James HengeniusDepartment of Mathematics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Khusbu PatelDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Bard ErmentroutCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Nathan N UrbanDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.

Funding

Organization and plasticity of post-synaptic targets of individual glomeruli in the mammalian olfactory bulbF30DC015161 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LIU, ANNIE · 2016 to 2018
$135k
NIDCD NIH HHS F30 DC015161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Navigating an odor landscape is a critical behavior for the survival of many species, including mice. An ethologically relevant mouse behavior is locating food using information about odor concentration. To approximate this behavior, we used an open field odor-based spot-finding task indoors with little wind, examining navigation strategies as mice search for and approach an odor source. After mice were trained to navigate to odor sources paired with food reward, we observed behavioral changes consistent with localization 10-45 cm away from the source. These behaviors included orientation toward the source, decreased velocity, and increased exploration time. We also found that the amplitude of 'casting,' which we define as lateral back and forth movement of the nose, increased with proximity to the source. Based on these observations, we created a concentration-sensitive agent-based model to simulate mouse behavior. This model provided evidence for a binaral-sniffing strategy (inter-nostril comparison of concentration in a single sniff) and a serial-sniffing strategy (sampling concentration, moving in space, and then sampling again). Serial-sniffing may be accomplished at farther distances by moving the body and at closer distances by moving the head (casting). Together, these results elucidate components of behavioral strategies for odor-based navigation.

Indexed as

binaral-olfactionbinaral-sniffingcastingnavigationolfactionserial-sniffing

Identifiers

PMID32265632
PMCPMC7101161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.