ArticleHippokratia
Combination of novel and traditional cardiorespiratory indices for the evaluation of adolescent volleyball players.
Article in Hippokratia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated Mechanical and Cardiopulmonary Adaptations During Repeated Jumps in Volleyball Players: Insights from CPET Analysis.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cardiorespiratory optimal point as a submaximal evaluation tool in endurance athletes: An exploratory study.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) test is an essential tool for the assessment of functional capacity in athletes, limited information exists regarding the cardiorespiratory efficiency in young elite volleyball players. The main objective of the present study was to determine the maximal oxygen uptake (VO
methodsEleven adolescent male (15.18 ± 0.75 years old) and 13 female (14.77 ± 0.44 years old) volleyball players underwent a graded maximal exercise test on a treadmill until exhaustion in order to obtain VO
resultsCOP values did not differ significantly between the two sexes (19.81 ± 1.29 and 20.44 ± 2.63 in males and females, respectively) and it was achieved at a speed of 3.41 ± 0.89 km/hr in males, and 3.78 ± 0.76 km/hr in females, lower than that achieved at the VT. COP was not correlated with VO
conclusionsThe novel submaximal cardiorespiratory index of COP does not seem to be associated with the traditional aerobic capacity indices in athletes such as VO
Indexed as
Identifiers
32265587PMC7127923W3026343224What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.