Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32265485›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2020

Dead or alive: sediment DNA archives as tools for tracking aquatic evolution and adaptation.

Marianne Ellegaard, Martha R J Clokie, Till Czypionka, Dagmar Frisch, Anna Godhe, Anke Kremp, Andrey Letarov, Terry J McGenity, Sofia Ribeiro, N John Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Marianne EllegaardDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark. mell@kp.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6032-3376
Martha R J ClokieDepartment of Genetics and Genome Biology, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK.
Till CzypionkaEcology, Evolution and Biodiversity Conservation, KU-Leuven, Charles Deberiotstraat 32 - box 2439, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7655-2897
Dagmar FrischUniversity of Birmingham, School of Biosciences, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9310-2230
Anna GodheDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, SE 405 30, Göteborg, Sweden.
Anke KrempFinnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Marine Research Centre, P.O.Box 140, 00251, Helsinki, Finland.
Andrey LetarovWinogradsky Institute of Microbiology RAS, prospect 60-letiya Oktyabrya 7/2, 117312, Moscow, Russia.
Terry J McGenitySchool of Life Sciences, University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1497-8822
Sofia RibeiroGlaciology and Climate Department, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 KBH-K, København, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0672-9161
N John AndersonDepartment of Geography, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0037-0306
Finnish Environment Institute · FIGeological Survey of Denmark and Greenland · DKKU Leuven · BELoughborough University · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Essex · GBUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA can be preserved in marine and freshwater sediments both in bulk sediment and in intact, viable resting stages. Here, we assess the potential for combined use of ancient, environmental, DNA and timeseries of resurrected long-term dormant organisms, to reconstruct trophic interactions and evolutionary adaptation to changing environments. These new methods, coupled with independent evidence of biotic and abiotic forcing factors, can provide a holistic view of past ecosystems beyond that offered by standard palaeoecology, help us assess implications of ecological and molecular change for contemporary ecosystem functioning and services, and improve our ability to predict adaptation to environmental stress.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGeologic SedimentsAcclimatizationAnimalsDNADNA, AncientDNA, ArchaealDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalDNA, ViralEcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringPhylogenyPhytoplanktonSpecies SpecificityTime FactorsDNADNA, AncientDNA, ArchaealDNA, BacterialDNA, FungalDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID32265485
PMCPMC7138834
OpenAlexW3015105347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.