Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32265293›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2020

Investigation of Inter- and Intratumoral Heterogeneity of Glioblastoma Using TOF-SIMS.

Samvel K Gularyan, Alexander A Gulin, Ksenia S Anufrieva, Victoria O Shender, Michail I Shakhparonov, Soniya Bastola, Nadezhda V Antipova, Tatiana F Kovalenko, Yury P Rubtsov, Yaroslav A Latyshev and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Spatial pharmacology using mass spectrometry imaging.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Drug resistance in glioblastoma: from chemo- to immunotherapy.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Samvel K GularyanN.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander A GulinN.N. Semenov Federal Research Center for Chemical Physics, Moscow, Russia; Department of Chemistry, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow Russia.
Ksenia S AnufrievaCenter for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia; Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow Region, Russia.
Victoria O ShenderCenter for Precision Genome Editing and Genetic Technologies for Biomedicine, Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia; Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Michail I ShakhparonovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Soniya BastolaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Wallace Tumor Institute, Birmingham, Alabama.
Nadezhda V AntipovaShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Tatiana F KovalenkoShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Yury P RubtsovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Yaroslav A LatyshevFederal State Autonomous Institution, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russia.
Alexander A PotapovFederal State Autonomous Institution, N.N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery, Moscow, Russia.
Marat S PavlyukovShemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia. Electronic address: marat.pav@mail.ru.
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry · RUBurdenko Neurosurgery Institute · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RUMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology · RUSemenov Institute of Chemical Physics · RUUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive human cancers with a median survival of less than two years. A distinguishing pathological feature of GBM is a high degree of inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity. Intertumoral heterogeneity of GBM has been extensively investigated on genomic, methylomic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomics levels, however only a few studies describe intratumoral heterogeneity because of the lack of methods allowing to analyze GBM samples with high spatial resolution. Here, we applied TOF-SIMS (Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry) for the analysis of single cells and clinical samples such as paraffin and frozen tumor sections obtained from 57 patients. We developed a technique that allows us to simultaneously detect the distribution of proteins and metabolites in glioma tissue with 800 nm spatial resolution. Our results demonstrate that according to TOF-SIMS data glioma samples can be subdivided into clinically relevant groups and distinguished from the normal brain tissue. In addition, TOF-SIMS was able to elucidate differences between morphologically distinct regions of GBM within the same tumor. By staining GBM sections with gold-conjugated antibodies against Caveolin-1 we could visualize border between zones of necrotic and cellular tumor and subdivide glioma samples into groups characterized by different survival of the patients. Finally, we demonstrated that GBM contains cells that are characterized by high levels of Caveolin-1 protein and cholesterol. This population may partly represent a glioma stem cells. Collectively, our results show that the technique described here allows to analyze glioma tissues with a spatial resolution beyond reach of most of other omics approaches and the obtained data may be used to predict clinical behavior of the tumor.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain NeoplasmsCaveolin 1CholesterolFemaleGlioblastomaHumansImmunohistochemistryMiceMice, NudeNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisSingle-Cell AnalysisSpatial AnalysisSpectrometry, Mass, Secondary IonXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysCaveolin 1Cholesterolcancer biomarker(s)caveolin-1Glioblastomagliomaimaging visualization toolsmass spectrometrystem cellsTOF-SIMS

Identifiers

PMID32265293
PMCPMC7261812
OpenAlexW3015130582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.