Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32265260›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

The Frog Motor Nerve Terminal Has Very Brief Action Potentials and Three Electrical Regions Predicted to Differentially Control Transmitter Release.

Scott P Ginebaugh, Eric D Cyphers, Viswanath Lanka, Gloria Ortiz, Evan W Miller, Rozita Laghaei, Stephen D Meriney

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. L-type CaCellular and molecular neurobiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Scott P GinebaughDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.
Eric D CyphersDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.
Viswanath LankaDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.
Gloria OrtizDepartments of Chemistry.
Evan W MillerDepartments of Chemistry.
Rozita LaghaeiBiomedical Application Group, Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213.
Stephen D MerineyDepartment of Neuroscience, Center for Neuroscience, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260 meriney@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · USDivision of Chemistry · USPittsburgh Supercomputing Center · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

TrainingP41GM103712 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FAEDER, JAMES · 2012 to 2021
$16.3M
Interrogating Neuronal Membrane Potential Dynamics with Optical Voltage SensorsR01NS098088 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Evan Walker Miller · 2017 to 2026
$4.4M
CRCNS: Transmitter Release Site Organization in Plasticity and Disease at the NMJR01NS090644 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BLANPIED, THOMAS A, LAGHAEI, ROZITA · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103712NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS090644NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS098088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The action potential (AP) waveform controls the opening of voltage-gated calcium channels and contributes to the driving force for calcium ion flux that triggers neurotransmission at presynaptic nerve terminals. Although the frog neuromuscular junction (NMJ) has long been a model synapse for the study of neurotransmission, its presynaptic AP waveform has never been directly studied, and thus the AP waveform shape and propagation through this long presynaptic nerve terminal are unknown. Using a fast voltage-sensitive dye, we have imaged the AP waveform from the presynaptic terminal of male and female frog NMJs and shown that the AP is very brief in duration and actively propagated along the entire length of the terminal. Furthermore, based on measured AP waveforms at different regions along the length of the nerve terminal, we show that the terminal is divided into three distinct electrical regions: A beginning region immediately after the last node of Ranvier where the AP is broadest, a middle region with a relatively consistent AP duration, and an end region near the tip of nerve terminal branches where the AP is briefer. We hypothesize that these measured changes in the AP waveform along the length of the motor nerve terminal may explain the proximal-distal gradient in transmitter release previously reported at the frog NMJ.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsFemaleForecastingMaleNeuromuscular JunctionNeurotransmitter AgentsOrgan Culture TechniquesRana pipiensSodium Channel BlockersTime FactorsNeurotransmitter AgentsSodium Channel BlockersAction potentialNerve terminalNeuromuscular junctionSynaptic transmissionVoltage imaging

Identifiers

PMID32265260
PMCPMC7189764
OpenAlexW3015147359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.