ArticleBMJ open2020
Novel health systems service design checklist to improve healthcare access for marginalised, underserved communities in Europe.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community-Based Preventive Health Interventions and Their Impact on Population Health Outcomes: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2026Review
- An equity analysis of remote patient monitoring programs unveils assumptions on digital health equity.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Addressing health equity during design and implementation of health system reform initiatives: a scoping review and framework.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- "I would be very proud to be part of an initiative that didn't exclude people because it was hard": mapping and contextualising health equity responsibilities and decision-making tensions in the implementation of a multi-level system reform initiative.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- How LGBTQ + adults' experiences of multiple disadvantage impact upon their health and social care service pathways in the UK & Ireland: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Determinates of STI prevention service utilisation among young and hard-to-reach populations: a protocol for a mixed-methods study in Foggia district, Italy, 2025.BMJ public health · 2025Article
- Design proposals for the preferred service ecosystem for senior citizens living at home: a service design study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Implementing a new HCV model of care for people who use drugs.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2024Article
- A call to create integrated services to better address the needs of migrants who use drugs in Europe.Harm reduction journal · 2024Review
- Combined COVID-19 vaccination and hepatitis C virus screening intervention in marginalised populations in Spain.Communications medicine · 2023Article
- Socioeconomic status in Danish transgender persons: a nationwide register-based cohort study.Endocrine connections · 2021Article
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on harm reduction services in Spain.Harm reduction journal · 2020Article
- Keeping governments accountable: the COVID-19 Assessment Scorecard (COVID-SCORE).Nature medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMarginalised communities such as homeless people, people who use drugs (PWUD), lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people (LGBTI), prisoners, sex workers and undocumented migrants are at high risk of poor health and yet face substantial barriers in accessing health and support services. The Nobody Left Outside (NLO) Service Design Checklist aims to promote a collaborative, evidence-based approach to service design and monitoring based on equity, non-discrimination and community engagement.
methodsThe Checklist was a collaborative project involving nine community advocacy organisations, with a focus on homeless people, PWUD, LGBTI people, prisoners, sex workers, and undocumented migrants. The Checklist was devised via a literature review; two NLO platform meetings; a multistakeholder policy workshop and an associated published concept paper; two conference presentations; and stakeholder consultation via a European Commission-led Thematic Network (including webinar).
resultsThe NLO Checklist has six sections in line with the WHO Health Systems Framework. These are: (1) service delivery, comprising design stage (6 items), services provided (2 items), accessibility and adaptation (16 items), peer support (2 items); (2) health workforce (12 items); (3) health information systems (7 items); (4) medical products and technologies (1 item); (5) financing (3 items); and (6) leadership and governance (7 items). It promotes the implementation of integrated (colocated or linked) healthcare services that are community based and people centred. These should provide a continuum of needs-based health promotion, disease prevention, diagnosis, treatment and management, together with housing, legal and social support services, in alignment with the goals of universal health coverage and the WHO frameworks on integrated, people-centred healthcare.
conclusionsThe Checklist is offered as a practical tool to help overcome inequalities in access to health and support services. Policymakers, public health bodies, healthcare authorities, practitioner bodies, peer support workers and non-governmental organisations can use it when developing, updating or monitoring services for target groups. It may also assist civil society in wider advocacy efforts to improve access for underserved communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.