Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32265247›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Novel health systems service design checklist to improve healthcare access for marginalised, underserved communities in Europe.

Jeffrey V Lazarus, Lee Baker, Mario Cascio, Denis Onyango, Eberhard Schatz, Alyna C Smith, Freek Spinnewijn, Nobody Left Outside initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Implementing a new HCV model of care for people who use drugs.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jeffrey V LazarusHospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain jeffrey.lazarus@isglobal.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9618-2299
Lee BakerInterel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5167-5305
Mario CascioEuropean AIDS Treatment Group, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6103-4130
Denis OnyangoAfrica Advocacy Foundation, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5451-5419
Eberhard SchatzCorrelation European Harm Reduction Network, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1636-790X
Alyna C SmithPlatform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3396-715X
Freek SpinnewijnEuropean Federation of National Organisations Working with the Homeless (FEANTSA), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2869-3385
Nobody Left Outside initiative

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMarginalised communities such as homeless people, people who use drugs (PWUD), lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and intersex people (LGBTI), prisoners, sex workers and undocumented migrants are at high risk of poor health and yet face substantial barriers in accessing health and support services. The Nobody Left Outside (NLO) Service Design Checklist aims to promote a collaborative, evidence-based approach to service design and monitoring based on equity, non-discrimination and community engagement.

methodsThe Checklist was a collaborative project involving nine community advocacy organisations, with a focus on homeless people, PWUD, LGBTI people, prisoners, sex workers, and undocumented migrants. The Checklist was devised via a literature review; two NLO platform meetings; a multistakeholder policy workshop and an associated published concept paper; two conference presentations; and stakeholder consultation via a European Commission-led Thematic Network (including webinar).

resultsThe NLO Checklist has six sections in line with the WHO Health Systems Framework. These are: (1) service delivery, comprising design stage (6 items), services provided (2 items), accessibility and adaptation (16 items), peer support (2 items); (2) health workforce (12 items); (3) health information systems (7 items); (4) medical products and technologies (1 item); (5) financing (3 items); and (6) leadership and governance (7 items). It promotes the implementation of integrated (colocated or linked) healthcare services that are community based and people centred. These should provide a continuum of needs-based health promotion, disease prevention, diagnosis, treatment and management, together with housing, legal and social support services, in alignment with the goals of universal health coverage and the WHO frameworks on integrated, people-centred healthcare.

conclusionsThe Checklist is offered as a practical tool to help overcome inequalities in access to health and support services. Policymakers, public health bodies, healthcare authorities, practitioner bodies, peer support workers and non-governmental organisations can use it when developing, updating or monitoring services for target groups. It may also assist civil society in wider advocacy efforts to improve access for underserved communities.

Indexed as

ChecklistChildEuropeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansSexual and Gender MinoritiesTransients and Migrantshealth policyorganisation of health servicespublic healthquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID32265247
PMCPMC7170642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.