Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32264916›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2020

Development of an autophagy-related gene expression signature for prognosis prediction in prostate cancer patients.

Daixing Hu, Li Jiang, Shengjun Luo, Xin Zhao, Hao Hu, Guozhi Zhao, Wei Tang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Daixing HuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Youyi Road, Yuan Jiagang, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400010, People's Republic of China.
Li JiangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Youyi Road, Yuan Jiagang, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400010, People's Republic of China.
Shengjun LuoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Youyi Road, Yuan Jiagang, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400010, People's Republic of China.
Xin ZhaoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Youyi Road, Yuan Jiagang, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400010, People's Republic of China.
Hao HuDepartment of Urology, The People's Hospital of Nan Chuan, Chongqing, 408400, People's Republic of China.
Guozhi ZhaoDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Youyi Road, Yuan Jiagang, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400010, People's Republic of China.
Wei TangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No.1 Youyi Road, Yuan Jiagang, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400010, People's Republic of China. tangwei2060@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer (PCa) is one of the most prevalent cancers that occur in men worldwide. Autophagy-related genes (ARGs) may play an essential role in multiple biological processes of prostate cancer. However, ARGs expression signature has rarely been used to investigate the association between autophagy and prognosis in PCa. This study aimed to identify and assess prognostic ARGs signature to predict overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in PCa patients.

methodsFirst, a total of 234 autophagy-related genes were obtained from The Human Autophagy Database. Then, differentially expressed ARGs were identified in prostate cancer patients based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to screen hub prognostic ARGs for overall survival and disease-free survival, and the prognostic model was constructed. Finally, the correlation between the prognostic model and clinicopathological parameters was further analyzed, including age, T status, N status, and Gleason score.

resultsThe OS-related prognostic model was constructed based on the five ARGs (FAM215A, FDD, MYC, RHEB, and ATG16L1) and significantly stratified prostate cancer patients into high- and low-risk groups in terms of OS (HR = 6.391, 95% CI = 1.581- 25.840, P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of the prediction model was 0.84. The OS-related prediction model values were higher in T3-4 than in T1-2 (P = 0.008), and higher in Gleason score  > 7 than  ≤ 7 (P = 0.015). In addition, the DFS-related prognostic model was constructed based on the 22 ARGs (ULK2, NLRC4, MAPK1, ATG4D, MAPK3, ATG2A, ATG9B, FOXO1, PTEN, HDAC6, PRKN, HSPB8, P4HB, MAP2K7, MTOR, RHEB, TSC1, BIRC5, RGS19, RAB24, PTK6, and NRG2), with AUC of 0.85 (HR = 7.407, 95% CI = 4.850-11.320, P < 0.001), which were firmly related to T status (P < 0.001), N status (P = 0.001), and Gleason score (P < 0.001).

conclusionsOur ARGs based prediction models are a reliable prognostic and predictive tool for overall survival and disease-free survival in prostate cancer patients.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsTranscriptomeAutophagyBiomarkers, TumorHumansMalePrognosisBiomarkers, TumorAutophagyGEOProstate cancerSurvivalTCGA

Identifiers

PMID32264916
PMCPMC7137440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.