ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2020
The GALA project: practical recommendations for the use of migalastat in clinical practice on the basis of a structured survey among Italian experts.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physical Fitness and Physical Function in Patients With Fabry Disease: A Cross-Sectional Multicentre Study.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Article
- Expanded screening for Fabry disease in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis: a multicenter Italian experience.Renal failure · 2025Article
- A review and recommendations for oral chaperone therapy in adult patients with Fabry disease.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Review
- Late-onset renal variant Fabry disease with R112H mutation and mild increase in plasma globotriaosylsphingosine: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Dapaglifozin on Albuminuria in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with FabrY Disease: The DEFY Study Design and Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Consensus recommendations for the treatment and management of patients with Fabry disease on migalastat: a modified Delphi study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Fabry Disease: Current and Novel Therapeutic Strategies. A Narrative Review.Current neuropharmacology · 2023Review
- Balance control impairments in Fabry disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Deficiency in the Screening Process of Fabry Disease: Analysis of Chronic Kidney Patients Not on Dialysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Review
- Cerebral Hemodynamic Changes to Transcranial Doppler in Asymptomatic Patients with Fabry's Disease.Brain sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOral migalastat has recently been approved for the treatment of Anderson-Fabry disease (FD) in patients aged ≥16 years with amenable mutations on the basis of two phase III trials, FACETS and ATTRACT. However, with the introduction of migalastat into clinical practice, it is important to correctly identify the patients who may gain the most benefits from this therapy. Due to the relatively recent availability of migalastat, its role in clinical practice still has to be included in guidelines or recommendations. On these bases, a multidisciplinary group of Italian Experts in the treatment of FD has run the GALA project, with the aim to collect the opinions of expert physicians and to propose some starting points for an experience-based use of migalastat.
resultsOverall, although studies and data from longer-term follow-up with migalastat are still emerging, available evidence is consistent in showing that this molecule does represent a suitable therapy for the treatment of FD, in patients aged ≥16 years and with amenable mutations. The use of migalastat as an oral option appears to be overall safe, and experience thus far indicates potential for improving quality of life, controlling GI symptoms, stabilizing renal function and reducing cardiac hypertrophy.
conclusionMigalastat can be considered either as a first-line therapy - given its efficacy, extensive tissue penetration, convenient oral regimen, and the current limited therapeutic options available - or in patients on enzyme-replacement therapy (ERT) who experience side effects, with poor compliance to chronic i.v. therapy, or with clinical evidence of progression of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.