Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32264861›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2020

Endogenous Endophthalmitis: yield of the diagnostic evaluation.

Kathleen A Regan, Nila S Radhakrishnan, Jon D Hammer, Benjamin D Wilson, Lara Beth Gadkowski, Siva S R Iyer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of intraocular lens removal combined with vitrectomy for acute endophthalmitis in pseudophakic eyes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Endogenous Endophthalmitis Caused byTurkish journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen A ReganDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Nila S RadhakrishnanDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Jon D HammerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 53610, USA.
Benjamin D WilsonDepartment of Ophthalmology, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Lara Beth GadkowskiDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases & Global Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Siva S R IyerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 1600 SW Archer Rd, Gainesville, FL, 53610, USA. ssr@ufl.edu.
Florida College · USSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndogenous endophthalmitis is an infection of the eye secondary to sepsis, occurring in 0.04-0.5% of bacteremia or fungemia. Risk factors include intravenous drug abuse (IVDA), diabetes, indwelling catheters, and immune suppression. Many patients have known or suspected bacteremia or fungemia; however, culture yield is reported to be low (approximately 50%). The purpose of this study is to elucidate the yield of diagnostic evaluation including microbial cultures over a 6.5 year period at an academic center in the United States.

methodsRetrospective chart review of patients with endogenous endophthalmitis at the University of Florida from June 2011 to February 2018.

resultsIncluded are 40 eyes of 35 patients. Endophthalmitis was secondary to an endogenous source in 23.5% of all endophthalmitis cases observed. Intraocular culture positivity was 28.6% overall but was 0% after initiation of systemic antibiotics. Most commonly identified organisms from the eye were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus and Candida. Blood culture positivity was 48.6%, most commonly Staphylococcus. IVDA was noted with increasing frequency as a risk factor. Diagnosis of endophthalmitis upon hospital admission was associated with a higher intraocular culture positivity (P = 0.040) and a shorter hospital stay (P = 0.035). Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were the highest yield imaging modalities; X-ray and non-ocular ultrasound were less diagnostically useful. Echocardiogram was positive by transesophageal route (TEE) in 22% and in 9% by transthoracic (TTE) testing. Following discharge from the hospital, 48.4% of patients failed to follow up with outpatient ophthalmology.

conclusionsBased on the results of this study, the interdisciplinary team should consider directed imaging, eye cultures prior to antimicrobial administration, thorough history for IVDA, and caution with premature discharge from the hospital.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAdultAgedBacteremiaBacteriaBacteriological TechniquesEchocardiographyEndophthalmitisEye Infections, BacterialEye Infections, FungalFemaleFloridaFungemiaFungiHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingDiagnostic imagingEndogenous endophthalmitisHospital dischargeIntravenous drug abuseSepsis

Identifiers

PMID32264861
PMCPMC7137237
OpenAlexW3014686504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.