Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32264760›Full record

ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2020

Liquid embolic agent Fe

Wei Li, Shikai Liang, Wei Zhang, Xuelian Zhao, Huifang Zhang, Xianli Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wei LiNeurosurgery Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xingtai Medical College, Xingtai, PR China.
Shikai LiangNeurosurgery Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, PR China.
Wei ZhangNeurosurgery Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, PR China.
Xuelian ZhaoNeurosurgery Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, PR China.
Huifang ZhangNeurosurgery Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, PR China.
Xianli LvNeurosurgery Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, PR China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8270-8464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimArteriovenous malformation (AVM) embolisation is in peril after the ARUBA trial. Advancements that are needed to reduce procedural risk are better control and visualisation during micro-catheter injection of liquid embolic material. The injectability, radiographic visualisation, mechanical stability and biocompatibility of the embolic agent Fe

methodsThe swine AVM model is the rete mirabile (RM). Nine swine AVM models were embolised with the embolic agent Fe

resultsSix swine underwent embolisation of one side rete, and three underwent embolisation of both sides. We did not experience any technical complication during embolisation of each rete. The micro-catheter was easy to retrieve. Fluoroscopic visualisation of the Fe

conclusionFe

Indexed as

Cerebral AngiographyAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsDisease Models, AnimalEmbolization, TherapeuticFerrosoferric OxideIntracranial Arteriovenous MalformationsPolyvinylsSwineBiocompatible Materialsethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymerFerrosoferric OxidePolyvinylsarteriovenous malformationembolisationFe3O4-EVOHrete mirabile

Identifiers

PMID32264760
PMCPMC7416346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.