Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32260594›Full record

ReviewVaccines2020

Utility of Healthcare System-Based Interventions in Improving the Uptake of Influenza Vaccination in Healthcare Workers at Long-Term Care Facilities: A Systematic Review.

Angela Bechini, Chiara Lorini, Patrizio Zanobini, Francesco Mandò Tacconi, Sara Boccalini, Maddalena Grazzini, Paolo Bonanni, Guglielmo Bonaccorsi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Infection control in long term care institutions for the elderly: A reflection document on the situation in Spain.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Angela BechiniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Chiara LoriniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Patrizio ZanobiniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Francesco Mandò TacconiNuovo Ospedale delle Apuane, North-West Tuscany LHU, Via Enrico Mattei, 21, 54100 Massa, Italy.
Sara BoccaliniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Maddalena GrazziniCareggi, University Hospital, Largo G. Alessandro Brambilla, 3, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Paolo BonanniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.
Guglielmo BonaccorsiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare workers (HCWs) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) can represent a source of influenza infection for the elderly. While flu vaccination coverage (VC) is satisfactory in the elderly, HCWs are less likely to be vaccinated. There is no definitive evidence on which types of healthcare system-based interventions at LTCFs would be more useful in improving the vaccination uptake among HCWs. We performed a systematic review in different databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Health Evidence, Web of Science, Cinahl) to provide a synthesis of the available studies on this topic. Among the 1177 articles screened by their titles and abstracts, 27 were included in this review. Most of the studies reported multiple interventions addressed to improve access to vaccination, eliminate individual barriers, or introduce policy interventions. As expected, mandatory vaccinations seem to be the most useful intervention to increase the vaccination uptake in HCWs. However, our study suggests that better results in the vaccination uptake in HCWs were obtained by combining interventions in different areas. Educational campaigns alone could not have an impact on vaccination coverage. LTCFs represent an ideal setting to perform preventive multi-approach interventions for the epidemiological transition toward aging and chronicity.

Indexed as

healthcare professionalshealthcare workers (HCWs)influenza vaccinationlong-term care facilities (LTCFs)nursing homesstaffutilityvaccination coverage

Identifiers

PMID32260594
PMCPMC7348755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.