Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32260508›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Hyaluronic and Polylactic Acid Filler Injections for Penile Augmentation in Men Reporting a Small Penis: A Multicenter, Patient-Blinded/Evaluator-Blinded, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Comparative Trial with 18 Months of Follow-up.

Dae Yul Yang, Hyun Cheol Jeong, Kyungtae Ko, Seong Ho Lee, Young Goo Lee, Won Ki Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Penile girth enhancement procedures for aesthetic purposes.International journal of impotence research · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dae Yul YangDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Hallym Unversity, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul 05355, Korea.
Hyun Cheol JeongDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Hallym Unversity, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul 05355, Korea.
Kyungtae KoDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Hallym Unversity, Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul 05355, Korea.
Seong Ho LeeDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Hallym Unversity, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong 18450, Korea.
Young Goo LeeDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Hallym Unversity, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul 07441, Korea.
Won Ki LeeDepartment of Urology, College of Medicine, Hallym Unversity, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Chuncheon 24253, Korea.
Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital · KRHallym University Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital · KRHallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital · KRHallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital · KR

Funding

Cha Meditech Co., Ltd. CMDHA0101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although several types of penile augmentation (PA) fillers have been recently introduced, no long-term follow-up studies have compared them. This study aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of hyaluronic acid (HA) and polylactic acid (PLA) filler injections for PA. Our multicenter, patient-blinded/evaluator-blinded, randomized comparative trial was performed for 18 months after the single injection of fillers. Sixty-seven healthy men reporting a small penis were administered an injection between November 2016 and May 2017. Subjects were divided into the HA group (n = 33) and PLA group (n = 34). At 18 months, the mean penile girths had significantly increased in both groups (each

Indexed as

augmentationfillerhyaluronic acidmenpenispolylactic acid

Identifiers

PMID32260508
PMCPMC7230452
OpenAlexW3015186221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.