SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
Xerostomia and Aalivary Flow in Patients Taking Antihypertensive Drugs.
Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Sodium-hyaluronate mouthwash on radiotherapy-induced xerostomia: a randomised clinical trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Trial
- Evaluation of salivary flow in patients following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective study.Hematology, transfusion and cell therapy · 2026Article
- The Intersection of Non-Communicable Chronic Disease and Endodontic Care: A Pilot Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Ninjin'yoeito for Impaired Oral Function in Older Adults: A Prospective, Open-Label Pilot Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- The Systemic Link Between Oral Health and Cardiovascular Disease: Contemporary Evidence, Mechanisms, and Risk Factor Implications.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Association Between Cardiovascular Disease and Complete Edentulism in U.S. Adults.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Associations Between Glycemic Control, Self-Reported Gingival Bleeding and Lifestyle Factors in Hospitalized Diabetic Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- An Update on the Interdisciplinary Dental Care Approach for Geriatric Diabetic Patients.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Autologous mesenchymal stem cells offer a new paradigm for salivary gland regeneration.International journal of oral science · 2023Review
- Salivary Assessments in Post-Liver Transplantation Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Association between antihypertensive drugs and the elderly's oral health- related quality of life: Results of Amirkola cohort study.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aims of this systematic review are (1) to compare the prevalence of xerostomia and hyposalivation between patients taking antihypertensive drugs with a control group (CG), (2) to compare salivary flow rate between patients treated with a CG, and (3) to identify which antihypertensives produce xerostomia. This systematic review was carried out according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. To evaluate methodological quality of the eligible studies Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias for clinical trials and the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale case-control studies were used. The databases were searched for studies up to November 19th 2019. The search strategy yielded 6201 results and 13 publications were finally included (five clinical trials and eight case-control studies). The results of the included studies did not provide evidence to state that patients taking antihypertensives suffer more xerostomia or hyposalivation than patients not taking them. With regard to salivary flow, only two clinical studies showed a significant decrease in salivary flow and even one showed a significant increase after treatment. The case-control studies showed great variability in salivary flow, but in this case most studies showed how salivary flow is lower in patients medicated with antihypertensive drugs. The great variability of antihypertensive drugs included, the types of studies and the outcomes collected made it impossible to study which antihypertensive drug produces more salivary alterations. The quality assessment showed how each of the studies was of low methodological quality. Therefore, future studies about this topic are necessary to confirm whether antihypertensive drugs produce salivary alterations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.