ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020
3D Printing of Hierarchical Scaffolds Based on Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses (MBGs)-Fundamentals and Applications.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- NovaBone Bioactive Glass for Oral Bone Regeneration: Mechanisms, Innovations, and Clinical Outcomes.Cureus · 2026Review
- Comparative mechanical characterisation of 13-93 bioactive glass and hybrid scaffolds for bone regeneration.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing of Calcium Phosphate-Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Article
- In Vivo Study of Bone Growth Around Additively Manufactured Implants With Ti-6Al-4V and Bioactive Glass Powder Composites.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2025Article
- Unravelling the Dopant-Induced Hemostasis and Osteogenesis in Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Advancements in mesoporous bioactive glasses for effective bone cancer therapy: Recent developments and future perspectives.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2025Review
- Personalized bioceramic grafts for craniomaxillofacial bone regeneration.International journal of oral science · 2024Review
- Special Issue: Porous Ceramics, Glasses and Composites, Volume II.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Review on Manufacturing Processes of Biocomposites Based on Poly(α-Esters) and Bioactive Glass Fillers for Bone Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Low-temperature deposition manufacturing technology: a novel 3D printing method for bone scaffolds.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Gelatin and Bioactive Glass Composites for Tissue Engineering: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2022Review
- Achievements in Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses for Biomedical Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Effect of Cellulose Nanofibers' Structure and Incorporation Route in Waterborne Polyurethane-Urea Based Nanocomposite Inks.Polymers · 2022Article
- Influence of Ceria Addition on Crystallization Behavior and Properties of Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses in the SiOGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Cerium-Containing Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses (MBGs)-Derived Scaffolds with Drug Delivery Capability for Potential Tissue Engineering Applications.Pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- High Precision 3D Printing for Micro to Nano Scale Biomedical and Electronic Devices.Micromachines · 2022Review
- Mesoporous Bioactive Glasses in Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy: Stimuli-Responsive, Toxicity, Immunogenicity, and Clinical Translation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
- 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State-Of-The-Art and Emerging Technologies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- 3D Printed SiOC(N) Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration: Improved Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Bioactive Inks Development for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering: A Mini-Review.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The advent of mesoporous bioactive glasses (MBGs) in applied bio-sciences led to the birth of a new class of nanostructured materials combining triple functionality, that is, bone-bonding capability, drug delivery and therapeutic ion release. However, the development of hierarchical three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds based on MBGs may be difficult due to some inherent drawbacks of MBGs (e.g., high brittleness) and technological challenges related to their fabrication in a multiscale porous form. For example, MBG-based scaffolds produced by conventional porogen-assisted methods exhibit a very low mechanical strength, making them unsuitable for clinical applications. The application of additive manufacturing techniques significantly improved the processing of these materials, making it easier preserving the textural and functional properties of MBGs and allowing stronger scaffolds to be produced. This review provides an overview of the major aspects relevant to 3D printing of MBGs, including technological issues and potential applications of final products in medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.