Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32260326›Full record

ReviewCells2020

Blocking Myc to Treat Cancer: Reflecting on Two Decades of Omomyc.

Daniel Massó-Vallés, Laura Soucek

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. MYC as a key target for melanoma therapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  6. c-Myc: an emerging participant in heart failure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel Massó-VallésPeptomyc S.L., Edifici Cellex, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4231-0456
Laura SoucekPeptomyc S.L., Edifici Cellex, 08035 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4750-7971
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ES

Funding

European Research Council 617473
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First designed and published in 1998 as a laboratory tool to study Myc perturbation, Omomyc has come a long way in the past 22 years. This dominant negative has contributed to our understanding of Myc biology when expressed, first, in normal and cancer cells, and later in genetically-engineered mice, and has shown remarkable anti-cancer properties in a wide range of tumor types. The recently described therapeutic effect of purified Omomyc mini-protein-following the surprising discovery of its cell-penetrating capacity-constitutes a paradigm shift. Now, much more than a proof of concept, the most characterized Myc inhibitor to date is advancing in its drug development pipeline, pushing Myc inhibition into the clinic.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsBiomedical ResearchEpigenesis, GeneticHumansNeoplasmsPeptide FragmentsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycTranscriptional Activationomomyc proteinPeptide FragmentsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycanticancer drugscancermouse modelsMycMyc inhibitionnew therapeuticsomomycpeptides

Identifiers

PMID32260326
PMCPMC7226798
OpenAlexW3014325871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.