ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: A Meta-Analysis of Deep Learning Models for Retinal Vessels Segmentation.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Image-Based Deep Learning for Cataract Diagnosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- VG-RETFound: a hybrid retinal AI framework for early vision impairment screening through vessel-graph learning and cross-modal fusion.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Dementia Detection via Retinal Hyperspectral Imaging and Deep Learning: Clinical Dataset Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Multiple Architectures.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Recent Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) Innovations for Increased Accessibility and Remote Surveillance.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A survey of recent methods for addressing AI fairness and bias in biomedicine.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2024Review
- Investigating awareness of artificial intelligence in healthcare among medical students and professionals in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
- Article
- Benefits of Information Technology in Healthcare: Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, and Personal Health Records.Healthcare informatics research · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Dementia: A Bibliometric Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Deep Learning for the Diagnosis of Esophageal Cancer in Endoscopic Images: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2022Review
- Quality assessment standards in artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy systematic reviews: a meta-research study.NPJ digital medicine · 2022Article
- The Development and Clinical Application of Innovative Optical Ophthalmic Imaging Techniques.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Review
- Assessment of the Risk of Severe Dengue Using Intrahost Viral Population in Dengue Virus Serotype 2 PatientsFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Application of Artificial Intelligence in COVID-19 Pandemic: Bibliometric Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Assessing the risk of dengue severity using demographic information and laboratory test results with machine learning.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020Article
- Machine Learning Approach to Reduce Alert Fatigue Using a Disease Medication-Related Clinical Decision Support System: Model Development and Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2020Article
- Accelerating ophthalmic artificial intelligence research: the role of an open access data repository.Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2020Review
- Artificial intelligence: the unstoppable revolution in ophthalmology.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAccurate retinal vessel segmentation is often considered to be a reliable biomarker of diagnosis and screening of various diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetic, and ophthalmologic diseases. Recently, deep learning (DL) algorithms have demonstrated high performance in segmenting retinal images that may enable fast and lifesaving diagnoses. To our knowledge, there is no systematic review of the current work in this research area. Therefore, we performed a systematic review with a meta-analysis of relevant studies to quantify the performance of the DL algorithms in retinal vessel segmentation.
methodsA systematic search on EMBASE, PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted for studies that were published between 1 January 2000 and 15 January 2020. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) procedure. The DL-based study design was mandatory for a study's inclusion. Two authors independently screened all titles and abstracts against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool for assessing the risk of bias and applicability.
resultsThirty-one studies were included in the systematic review; however, only 23 studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. DL showed high performance for four publicly available databases, achieving an average area under the ROC of 0.96, 0.97, 0.96, and 0.94 on the DRIVE, STARE, CHASE_DB1, and HRF databases, respectively. The pooled sensitivity for the DRIVE, STARE, CHASE_DB1, and HRF databases was 0.77, 0.79, 0.78, and 0.81, respectively. Moreover, the pooled specificity of the DRIVE, STARE, CHASE_DB1, and HRF databases was 0.97, 0.97, 0.97, and 0.92, respectively.
conclusionThe findings of our study showed the DL algorithms had high sensitivity and specificity for segmenting the retinal vessels from digital fundus images. The future role of DL algorithms in retinal vessel segmentation is promising, especially for those countries with limited access to healthcare. More compressive studies and global efforts are mandatory for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of DL-based tools for retinal disease screening worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.