Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32260111›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

An Enhanced Social Networking Intervention for Young People with Active Suicidal Ideation: Safety, Feasibility and Acceptability Outcomes.

Eleanor Bailey, Mario Alvarez-Jimenez, Jo Robinson, Simon D'Alfonso, Maja Nedeljkovic, Christopher G Davey, Sarah Bendall, Tamsyn Gilbertson, Jessica Phillips, Lisa Bloom and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eleanor BaileyOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4918-1618
Mario Alvarez-JimenezOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Jo RobinsonOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5652-918X
Simon D'AlfonsoOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Maja NedeljkovicSwinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia.
Christopher G DaveyOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Sarah BendallOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Tamsyn GilbertsonOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Jessica PhillipsOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Lisa BloomOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Laura NichollsOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Nicola GarlandOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Daniela CagliariniOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Mark PhelanOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Ben McKechnieOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Jessica MitchellOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Melanie CookeOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Simon M RiceOrygen, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4045-8553
The University of Melbourne · AUOrygen · AUSwinburne University of Technology · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Online social networking interventions have potential to support young people who experience suicidal thoughts by specifically addressing interpersonal risk factors for suicide, but may also pose a risk of harm. This uncontrolled, single-group pilot study aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of an enhanced online social networking intervention ("Affinity") among a sample of young people who experienced active suicidal ideation, and to explore potential changes in clinical outcomes and the therapeutic targets of the intervention. Twenty young people with current or recent suicidal ideation who were receiving treatment for depression at a tertiary-level mental health service were given access to Affinity for two months. Participants were assessed at baseline and 8-week follow-up; 90 percent reported clinical suicidal ideation at baseline. A priori criteria related to feasibility, safety and acceptability were satisfied. In terms of potential clinical effects, significant and reliable pre-post improvements were found on self-report outcomes including suicidal ideation. This study provides initial world-first evidence to support the use of an online intervention incorporating social networking as an adjunct to treatment for young people who experience suicidal ideation. The effectiveness of Affinity needs to be evaluated in a randomised controlled trial.

Indexed as

Social NetworkingSuicidal IdeationSuicide PreventionAdolescentFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsinternetInterpersonal Theory of Suicideinterventionssocial mediasuicideyoung people

Identifiers

PMID32260111
PMCPMC7177782
OpenAlexW3014916758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.