ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2020
Anthropogenic noise impairs foraging for cryptic prey via cross-sensory interference.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Light and ultrasonic noise pollution displaces trawling Daubenton's bats.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- How female treefrogs weigh unimodal and multimodal sexual displays in the absence and presence of noise.Current zoology · 2025Article
- Restoring landscapes and communities: Insights from critical, urban, and plant ecology.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2025Review
- Anuran communities increase aggregations of conspecific calls in response to aircraft noise.Current zoology · 2025Article
- Consistency in responses to conspecific advertisement calls with various signal-to-noise ratios in both sexes of the Anhui tree frog.Current zoology · 2023Article
- Plateau pikas near roads are bold and silent when facing a potential predator.Current zoology · 2023Article
- Interspecific differences in the effects of masking and distraction on anti-predator behavior in suburban anthropogenic noise.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- A comprehensive overview of the effects of urbanisation on sexual selection and sexual traits.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022Review
- Noise distracts foraging bats.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Anthropogenic noise impairs foraging for cryptic prey via cross-sensory interference.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anthropogenic noise levels are globally rising with profound impacts on ecosystems and the species that live in them. Masking or distraction by noise can interfere with relevant sounds and thereby impact ecological interactions between individuals of the same or different species. Predator-prey dynamics are particularly likely to be influenced by rising noise levels, with important population- and community-level consequences, as species may differentially adapt to noise disturbance. Acoustic noise can, however, also impair the use of visual information by animals through the process of cross-sensory interference, possibly impacting species interactions that have so far been largely ignored by noise impact studies. Here, we assessed how noise affected the performance of great tit (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.