ReviewJournal of educational evaluation for health professions2020
Change of accreditation standards of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation from 2000 to 2019.
Review in Journal of educational evaluation for health professions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond intentions: a critical narrative review of accreditation's planned and emergent impact on medical schools.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2026Review
- Challenges and potential improvements in the Accreditation Standards of the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation 2019 (ASK2019) derived through meta-evaluation: a cross-sectional studyJournal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2024Article
- Article
- Impact of external accreditation on students' performance: Insights from a full accreditation cycle.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Accreditation standards items of post-2nd cycle related to the decision of accreditation of medical schools by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation.Korean journal of medical education · 2023Article
- The impact of external academic accreditation of undergraduate medical program on students' satisfaction.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Development of consensus-based aims, contents, intended learning outcomes, teaching, and evaluation methods for a history of medicine and pharmacy course for medical and pharmacy students in the Arab world: a Delphi study.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- Why social accountability of medical schools in Sudan can lead to better primary healthcare and excellence in medical education?Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It aimed to provide the change of accreditation standards of medical schools in Korea by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation (KIMEE) from 2000 to 2019. Specifically, the following was explained: the development process, setting principle and direction, items of evaluation, characteristics of the standards, and validity test of 4 cycles. The first cycle of accreditation (2000-2005) was a process to secure the minimum requirement of the educational environment. The evaluation criteria emphasized the evaluation of the core elements of medical education, including facilities and human resources. The second cycle of accreditation (2007-2010) was a process in which the university emphasized its commitment to social accountability and the pursuit of excellence in medical education. It raised the importance of the qualitative standard for judging the contents and fidelity of education. In the post-2nd cycle of accreditation (2012-2018), the certification criteria were developed to standardize the educational environment and educational programs and to use them in the development of curriculum, to continually improve the quality of basic medical education. The ASK2019 accreditation aimed at qualitative evaluation following the World Federation of Medical Education's accreditation criteria to reach the international level of basic medical education, which stresses the student-centered curriculum, communication with the society, and evaluation through whole basic medical education course. KIMEE has developed the basic medical education evaluation and certification system step by step as above. Understanding the previous process will help to develop the accreditation criteria of medical school in Korea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.