Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32259294›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of surgery2020

Effect of omission of surgery on survival in patients aged 80 years and older with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

A Z de Boer, N A de Glas, P J Marang-van de Mheen, O M Dekkers, S Siesling, L de Munck, K M de Ligt, G J Liefers, J E A Portielje, E Bastiaannet

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A Z de BoerDepartment of Surgery, Leiden, the Netherlands.
N A de GlasDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
P J Marang-van de MheenDepartment of Medical Decision-Making, Leiden, the Netherlands.
O M DekkersDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.
S SieslingDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
L de MunckDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
K M de LigtDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
G J LiefersDepartment of Surgery, Leiden, the Netherlands.
J E A PortieljeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Leiden, the Netherlands.
E BastiaannetDepartment of Surgery, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity of Twente · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NL

Funding

ZonMw 843002623
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgery is increasingly being omitted in older patients with operable breast cancer in the Netherlands. Although omission of surgery can be considered in frail older patients, it may lead to inferior outcomes in non-frail patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of omission of surgery on relative and overall survival in older patients with operable breast cancer.

methodsPatients aged 80 years or older diagnosed with stage I-II hormone receptor-positive breast cancer between 2003 and 2009 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. An instrumental variable approach was applied to minimize confounding, using hospital variation in rate of primary surgery. Relative and overall survival was compared between patients treated in hospitals with different rates of surgery.

resultsOverall, 6464 patients were included. Relative survival was lower for patients treated in hospitals with lower compared with higher surgical rates (90·2 versus 92·4 per cent respectively after 5 years; 71·6 versus 88·2 per cent after 10 years). The relative excess risk for patients treated in hospitals with lower surgical rates was 2·00 (95 per cent c.i. 1·17 to 3·40). Overall survival rates were also lower among patients treated in hospitals with lower compared with higher surgical rates (48·3 versus 51·3 per cent after 5 years; 15·0 versus 19·7 per cent after 10 years respectively; adjusted hazard ratio 1·07, 95 per cent c.i. 1·00 to 1·14).

conclusionOmission of surgery is associated with worse relative and overall survival in patients aged 80 years or more with stage I-II hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Future research should focus on the effect on quality of life and physical functioning.

Indexed as

Aged, 80 and overAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansNetherlandsProportional Hazards ModelsSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID32259294
PMCPMC7496090
OpenAlexW3015084103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.