Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32259292›Full record

Trial reportDevelopmental medicine and child neurology2020

Electronic participation-focused care planning support for families: a pilot study.

Jessica M Jarvis, Vera C Kaelin, Dana Anaby, Rachel Teplicky, Mary A Khetani

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Supporting families during pediatric critical illness: Opportunities identified in a multicenter, qualitative study.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Participation-Focused Strategy Use Among Caregivers of Children Receiving Early Intervention.The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica M JarvisDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2988-7429
Vera C KaelinRehabilitation Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1290-9441
Dana AnabySchool of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2453-5643
Rachel TeplickyCanChild Centre for Childhood Disability Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Mary A KhetaniDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2628-3371
University of Illinois Chicago · USMcGill University · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Strengthening Stakeholder Engagement in Human Research Protections.UL1TR002003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KARNIK, NIRANJAN SUBHASH, MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J. · 2016 to 2024
$33.7M
PEDIATRIC NEUROINTENSIVE CARE AND RESUSCITATION RESEARCHT32HD040686 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Robert S B Clark, PATRICK M KOCHANEK · 2000 to 2026
$7.1M
American Occupational Therapy Foundation AOTFIRG15KHETANINCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002003NICHD NIH HHS L40 HD085277NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD040686
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of Participation and Environment Measure-Plus (PEM+) 2.0, an optimized version of a web-based, participation-focused, care-planning tool.

methodTwenty-two caregivers of children aged 0 to 5 years receiving rehabilitation services, who reported dissatisfaction with their child's participation, had internet access, and could read and write English, were recruited for this 2-week, single-arm pilot trial. Feasibility was assessed through retention rates, completion time, percentage of care plans developed relative to caregiver reported need, and independent completion of PEM+ 2.0. Acceptability was assessed by the Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use Questionnaire. Preliminary effects were assessed by two items on caregiver reported impact of PEM+ 2.0 on confidence for addressing their child's participation.

resultsEighteen caregivers completed at least one iteration of PEM+ 2.0; of those, 17 were female and 15 were 30 to 39 years old. The median completion time was 12.99 minutes (quartile 1, 6.30; quartile 3, 17.33), mean care plan creation relative to need was 50% (standard deviation [SD] 31), and 17 completed PEM+ 2.0 independently. Mean acceptability scores were 3.80 to 4.97 (SD 1.25-1.97) and mean preliminary effect scores were 4.61 to 4.72 (SD 1.85-2.24), out of 7.0. There were strong and significant positive associations between two of the three estimates of PEM+ 2.0 acceptability and caregiver confidence (r=0.577-0.793, p<0.01).

interpretationElectronic health tools have the potential for facilitating family-centered care in pediatric rehabilitation. PEM+ 2.0 is a feasible tool within pediatric rehabilitation and has potential to be an acceptable tool for improving caregiver confidence for promoting their child's participation in valued activities. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Participation and Environment Measure-Plus (PEM+) 2.0 is feasible for collaboratively engaging caregivers in the care-planning process. Caregivers perceived PEM+ 2.0 as helpful for thinking about their child's participation and what can be done to improve it. Feasibility and acceptability results will inform PEM+ 2.0 optimizations.

Indexed as

CaregiversPatient Care PlanningPatient ParticipationAdultChild, PreschoolFamilyFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePilot ProjectsRehabilitationTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID32259292
PMCPMC7332406
OpenAlexW3014905810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.