Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32259266›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Effectiveness of Iodophor vs Chlorhexidine Solutions for Surgical Site Infections and Unplanned Reoperations for Patients Who Underwent Fracture Repair: The PREP-IT Master Protocol.

Program of Randomized Trials to Evaluate Pre-operative Antiseptic Skin Solutions in Orthopaedic Trauma (PREP-IT) Investigators, Gerard P Slobogean, Sheila Sprague, Jeffrey Wells, Mohit Bhandari, Alejandra Rojas, Alisha Garibaldi, Amber Wood, Andrea Howe, Anthony D Harris and 38 more

Erratum issued 3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03385304 phase4completednot on this map

Aqueous-PREP: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial Evaluating Pre-operative Aqueous Antiseptic Skin Solutions in Open Fractures

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Maryland, BaltimoreRan2018 to 2022Enrolled1,638ConditionsSurgical Site Infection, Unplanned Fracture-Related Reoperation, Open Appendicular FractureArms10% povidone-iodine (1% free iodine) in purified water, 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) in purified water
NCT03523962 phase4completednot on this map

PREPARE: A Pragmatic Randomized Trial Evaluating Pre-operative Alcohol Skin Solutions in FRactured Extremites

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Maryland, BaltimoreRan2018 to 2024Enrolled8,485ConditionsSurgical Site Infection, Unplanned Fracture-Related Reoperation, Open Appendicular Fracture, Closed Lower Extremity FractureArmsDuraPrep, ChloraPrep
NCT05613257 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Free-Hand Versus Distal Targeting Jig-Based for Distal Interlock Screw Placement

TypeinterventionalSponsorCedars-Sinai Medical CenterRan2022 to 2024Enrolled89ConditionsFemur Fracture, Tibial Fractures, Nonunion of Fracture, Nonunion of Fracture of TibiaArmsDistal targeting jig, Free-hand/perfect circles technique
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Outcomes Associated with Choice of Prophylactic Antibiotics in Open Fractures.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2025
    Article
  4. Open fractures: evidence-based best practices.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Local administration of vancomycin powder in orthopaedic fracture surgery: current practice and trends.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Error in Article Information Section.JAMA network open · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

48 authors at 15 institutions in 2 countries.

Program of Randomized Trials to Evaluate Pre-operative Antiseptic Skin Solutions in Orthopaedic Trauma (PREP-IT) Investigators
Gerard P SlobogeanDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Sheila SpragueDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Jeffrey WellsTrauma Survivors Network, Falls Church, Virginia.
Mohit BhandariDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Alejandra RojasDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Alisha GaribaldiDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Amber WoodAssociation of periOperative Registered Nurses, Denver, Colorado.
Andrea HoweDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Anthony D HarrisDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Bradley A PetrisorDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel C MullinsDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore.
David PogorzelskiDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Debra MarvelPatient Advisor, Baltimore, Maryland.
Diane Heels-AnsdellDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Franca MossutoHamilton Health Science, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Frances GrissomTrauma Survivor Network, Baltimore, Maryland.
Gina Del FabbroDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Gordon H GuyattDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Gregory J Della RoccaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia.
Haley K DemyanovichDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
I Leah GitajnDepartment of Orthopaedics, Dartmouth University, Hanover, New Hampshire.
Jana PalmerPatient Advisor, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jean-Claude D'AlleyrandDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
Jeff FriedrichWashington, DC.
Jessica RiveraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas.
Joan HebdenDepartment of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore.
Joshua RudnickiDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Justin FowlerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, San Antonio Military Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas.
Kyle J JerayDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Greenville Health System, Greenville, South Carolina.
Lehana ThabaneDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lucas MarchandDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Lyndsay M O'HaraDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Manjari G JoshiDepartment of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Max TalbotCanadian Armed Forces, Montreal, Qubec, Canada.
Megan CamaraDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Olivia Paige SzaszDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Nathan N O'HaraDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Paula McKayDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
P J DevereauxDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Robert V O'TooleDepartment of Orthopaedics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore.
Robert ZuraDepartment of Orthopaedics, Louisiana State University Health, New Orleans.
Saam MorshedDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco.
Shannon DoddsDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Silvia LiDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Stephanie L TannerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Greenville Health System, Greenville, South Carolina.
Taryn ScottDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Uyen NguyenDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USMcMaster University · CAImpact · CAPrisma Health · USBrooke Army Medical Center · USDartmouth College · USInternational Trauma Anesthesia and Critical Care Society · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USAssociation of Perioperative Registered Nurses · USUniversity of Utah · USWalter Reed National Military Medical Center · USCanadian Armed Forces · CAHamilton Health Sciences · CALouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The risk of developing a surgical site infection after extremity fracture repair is nearly 5 times greater than in most elective orthopedic surgical procedures. For all surgical procedures, it is standard practice to prepare the operative site with an antiseptic solution; however, there is limited evidence to guide the choice of solution used for orthopedic fracture repair. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of iodophor vs chlorhexidine solutions to reduce surgical site infections and unplanned fracture-related reoperations for patients who underwent fracture repair. Design, Setting, and Participants: The PREP-IT (Program of Randomized Trials to Evaluate Pre-operative Antiseptic Skin Solutions in Orthopaedic Trauma) master protocol will be followed to conduct 2 multicenter pragmatic cluster randomized crossover trials, Aqueous-PREP (Pragmatic Randomized Trial Evaluating Pre-Operative Aqueous Antiseptic Skin Solution in Open Fractures) and PREPARE (Pragmatic Randomized Trial Evaluating Pre-Operative Alcohol Skin Solutions in Fractured Extremities). The Aqueous-PREP trial will compare 4% aqueous chlorhexidine vs 10% povidone-iodine for patients with open extremity fractures. The PREPARE trial will compare 2% chlorhexidine in 70% isopropyl alcohol vs 0.7% iodine povacrylex in 74% isopropyl alcohol for patients with open extremity fractures and patients with closed lower extremity or pelvic fractures. Both trials will share key aspects of study design and trial infrastructure. The studies will follow a pragmatic cluster randomized crossover design with alternating treatment periods of approximately 2 months. The primary outcome will be surgical site infection and the secondary outcome will be unplanned fracture-related reoperations within 12 months. The Aqueous-PREP trial will enroll a minimum of 1540 patients with open extremity fractures from at least 12 hospitals; PREPARE will enroll a minimum of 1540 patients with open extremity fractures and 6280 patients with closed lower extremity and pelvic fractures from at least 18 hospitals. The primary analyses will adhere to the intention-to-treat principle and account for potential between-cluster and between-period variability. The patient-centered design, implementation, and dissemination of results are guided by a multidisciplinary team that includes 3 patients and other relevant stakeholders. Discussion: The PREP-IT master protocol increases efficiency through shared trial infrastructure and study design components. Because prophylactic skin antisepsis is used prior to all surgical procedures and the application, cost, and availability of all study solutions are similar, the results of the PREP-IT trials are poised to inform clinical guidelines and bring about an immediate change in clinical practice. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT03385304 and NCT03523962.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineFractures, BoneIodophorsSurgical Wound InfectionHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicOrthopedic ProceduresPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReoperationAnti-Infective Agents, LocalChlorhexidineIodophors

Identifiers

PMID32259266
PMCPMC7139274
OpenAlexW3014483166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.