Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32259228›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2020

Effect of Doxorubicin Plus Olaratumab vs Doxorubicin Plus Placebo on Survival in Patients With Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas: The ANNOUNCE Randomized Clinical Trial.

William D Tap, Andrew J Wagner, Patrick Schöffski, Javier Martin-Broto, Anders Krarup-Hansen, Kristen N Ganjoo, Chueh-Chuan Yen, Albiruni R Abdul Razak, Alexander Spira, Akira Kawai and 12 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02451943 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial of Doxorubicin Plus Olaratumab Versus Doxorubicin Plus Placebo in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 176 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
25.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02451943 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Trial of Doxorubicin Plus Olaratumab Versus Doxorubicin Plus Placebo in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorEli Lilly and CompanyRan2015 to 2024Enrolled509ConditionsSoft Tissue SarcomaArmsOlaratumab, Doxorubicin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 291 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. SEOM-GEIS Spanish clinical guidelines for the management of soft‑tissue sarcomas (2024).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. First-line Anlotinib plus Anthracyclines and Ifosfamide Followed by Anlotinib Maintenance in Advanced Soft-Tissue Sarcoma: A Phase II Single-Arm Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. First-Line Anlotinib Treatment for Soft-Tissue Sarcoma in Chemotherapy-Ineligible Patients: An Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase 2 Clinical Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. A Phase 1/2 Trial Combining Avelumab and Trabectedin for Advanced Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Prospective Evaluation of Doxorubicin Cardiotoxicity in Patients with Advanced Soft-tissue Sarcoma Treated in the ANNOUNCE Phase III Randomized Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  20. Article

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 18 institutions in 11 countries.

William D TapDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Andrew J WagnerDana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Patrick SchöffskiUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Department of General Medical Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium.
Javier Martin-BrotoMedical Oncology Department in University Hospital Virgen del Rocio and Institute of Biomedicine of Sevilla (IBIS) (HUVR, CSIC, University of Sevilla), Sevilla, Spain.
Anders Krarup-HansenUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristen N GanjooStanford University, Stanford, California.
Chueh-Chuan YenDivision of Medical Oncology, Center for Immuno-oncology, Department of Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Albiruni R Abdul RazakPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alexander SpiraVirginia Cancer Specialists, Fairfax.
Akira KawaiNational Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Axel Le CesneInstitut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Brian A Van TineDepartment of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Yoichi NaitoNational Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Se Hoon ParkSungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Alexander FedenkoBlokhin Cancer Research Center, Moscow, Russian Federation.
Zsuzsanna PápaiMagyar Honvedseg Eu Kp, Budapest, Hungary.
Victoria SoldatenkovaEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Ashwin ShahirEli Lilly and Company, Windlesham, United Kingdom.
Gary MoEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Jennifer WrightEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Robin L JonesSarcoma Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
ANNOUNCE Investigators
Eli Lilly (United States) · USCornell University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USEli Lilly (United Kingdom) · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla · ESKU Leuven · BENational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CARussian Cancer Research Center NN Blokhin · RUStanford University · USSungkyunkwan University · KRTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TWTokyo National Hospital · JPUniversity of Copenhagen · DKVirginia Cancer Specialists · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) have a median overall survival of less than 2 years. In a phase 2 study, an overall survival benefit in this population was observed with the addition of olaratumab to doxorubicin over doxorubicin alone. Objective: To determine the efficacy of doxorubicin plus olaratumab in patients with advanced/metastatic STS. Design, Setting, and Participants: ANNOUNCE was a confirmatory, phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial conducted at 110 sites in 25 countries from September 2015 to December 2018; the final date of follow-up was December 5, 2018. Eligible patients were anthracycline-naive adults with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic STS, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1, and cardiac ejection fraction of 50% or greater. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive doxorubicin, 75 mg/m2 (day 1), combined with olaratumab (n = 258), 20 mg/kg in cycle 1 and 15 mg/kg in subsequent cycles, or placebo (n = 251) on days 1 and 8 for up to 8 21-day cycles, followed by olaratumab/placebo monotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dual primary end points were overall survival with doxorubicin plus olaratumab vs doxorubicin plus placebo in total STS and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) populations. Results: Among the 509 patients randomized (mean age, 56.9 years; 58.2% women; 46.0% with LMS), all were included in the primary analysis and had a median length of follow-up of 31 months. No statistically significant difference in overall survival was observed between the doxorubicin plus olaratumab group vs the doxorubicin plus placebo group in either population (total STS: hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.84-1.30], P = .69, median overall survival, 20.4 months vs 19.7 months; LMS: hazard ratio, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.69-1.31], P = .76, median overall survival, 21.6 months vs 21.9 months). Adverse events of grade 3 or greater reported in 15% or more of total patients with STS were neutropenia (46.3% vs 49.0%), leukopenia (23.3% vs 23.7%), and febrile neutropenia (17.5% vs 16.5%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 3 clinical trial of patients with advanced STS, treatment with doxorubicin plus olaratumab vs doxorubicin plus placebo resulted in no significant difference in overall survival. The findings did not confirm the overall survival benefit observed in the phase 2 trial. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02451943.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDouble-Blind MethodDoxorubicinDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlacebosProportional Hazards ModelsSarcomaAntibiotics, AntineoplasticAntibodies, MonoclonalDoxorubicinolaratumabPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID32259228
PMCPMC7139275
OpenAlexW3014683777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.