Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32259160›Full record

ArticleJCO global oncology2020

Survey of Fertility Preservation Options Available to Patients With Cancer Around the Globe.

Alexandra S Rashedi, Saskia F de Roo, Lauren M Ataman, Maxwell E Edmonds, Adelino Amaral Silva, Anibal Scarella, Anna Horbaczewska, Antoinette Anazodo, Ayse Arvas, Bruno Ramalho de Carvalho and 53 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO global oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. The Educational Program for Healthcare Providers Regarding Fertility Preservation for Cancer Patients: a Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A 12-year overview of fertility preservation practice in Nordic pediatric oncology centers.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

63 authors.

Alexandra S RashediNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Saskia F de RooRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Lauren M AtamanNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Maxwell E EdmondsNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Adelino Amaral SilvaGENESIS-Center for Assistance in Human Reproduction, Brasília, Brazil.
Anibal ScarellaUniversidad de Valparaiso, Valparaiso, Chile.
Anna HorbaczewskaJagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Antoinette AnazodoUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ayse ArvasOnkofertilite Turkiye, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bruno Ramalho de CarvalhoBONVENA-Reproductive Medicine, Brasília, Brazil.
Cassio SartorioVida Centro de Fertilidade, Brazil.
Catharina C M BeerendonkRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Cesar Diaz-GarciaUniversity of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Chang Suk SuhSeoul National University Hospital College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Cláudia MeloUniversity of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Claus Yding AndersenUniversity of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eduardo MottaUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Ellen M GreenblattUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ellen Van MoerUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Elnaz ZandRoyan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, Tehran, Iran.
Fernando M ReisUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Flor SánchezCentro de Estudios e Investigaciones en Biología y Medicina Reproductiva, Lima, Peru.
Guillermo TerradoPregna Medicina Reproductiva, Caba, Argentina.
Jhenifer K RodriguesUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil.
João Marcos de Meneses E SilvaCeará Blood Center, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Johan SmitzUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Jose MedranoInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Jung Ryeol LeeSeoul National University Hospital College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Katharina Winkler-CrepazMedical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Kristin SmithNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Lígia Helena Ferreira Melo E SilvaCeará Blood Center, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Ludwig WildtMedical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Mahmoud SalamaNational Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
María Del Mar AndrésInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Maria T BourlonInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutricíon Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico.
Mario VegaIVF Centro de Reproducción, Panama City, Panama.
Maurício Barbour ChehinUniversity of Santo Amaro, Manila, Philippines.
Michel De VosVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Mohamed KhroufUniversité de Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Nao SuzukiSt Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Osama AzmyNational Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
Paula FontouraBanco de Sêmen do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Paulo Henrique Almeida Campos-JuniorFederal University of São João del-Rei, São João del-Rei, Brazil.
Peter MallmannUniversity of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Ricardo AzambujaFertilitat Centro de Medicina Reprodutiva, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Ricardo M MarinhoPró-Criar Medicina Reprodutiva, Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Richard A AndersonUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Robert JachJagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.
Roberto de A AntunesFertipraxis Centro de Reprodução Humana, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rod MitchellUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Rouhollah FathiRoyan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, Tehran, Iran.
Satish Kumar AdigaManipal University, Manipal, India.
Seido TakaeSt Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Seok Hyun KimSeoul National University Hospital College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sergio RomeroCentro de Estudios e Investigaciones en Biología y Medicina Reproductiva, Lima, Peru.
Silvana Chedid GriecoIVI São Paulo-Chedid Grieco, São Paulo, Brazil.
Talya ShaulovUniversity of Montreal Hospital Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Tatsuro FuruiGifu University School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan.
Teresa Almeida-SantosUniversity of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Willianne NelenRadboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Yasmin JayasingheRoyal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Yodo SugishitaSt Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Teresa K WoodruffNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL.

Funding

Project 3: Medically-based Protection of the Ovarian Reserve Against Anti-CancerP50HD076188 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WOODRUFF, TERESA K · 2014 to 2017
$6.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD076188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Oncofertility focuses on providing fertility and endocrine-sparing options to patients who undergo life-preserving but gonadotoxic cancer treatment. The resources needed to meet patient demand often are fragmented along disciplinary lines. We quantify assets and gaps in oncofertility care on a global scale. Methods: Survey-based questionnaires were provided to 191 members of the Oncofertility Consortium Global Partners Network, a National Institutes of Health-funded organization. Responses were analyzed to measure trends and regional subtleties about patient oncofertility experiences and to analyze barriers to care at sites that provide oncofertility services. Results: Sixty-three responses were received (response rate, 25%), and 40 were analyzed from oncofertility centers in 28 countries. Thirty of 40 survey results (75%) showed that formal referral processes and psychological care are provided to patients at the majority of sites. Fourteen of 23 respondents (61%) stated that some fertility preservation services are not offered because of cultural and legal barriers. The growth of oncofertility and its capacity to improve the lives of cancer survivors around the globe relies on concentrated efforts to increase awareness, promote collaboration, share best practices, and advocate for research funding. Conclusion: This survey reveals global and regional successes and challenges and provides insight into what is needed to advance the field and make the discussion of fertility preservation and endocrine health a standard component of the cancer treatment plan. As the field of oncofertility continues to develop around the globe, regular assessment of both international and regional barriers to quality care must continue to guide process improvements.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsFertility PreservationNeoplasmsFertilityHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID32259160
PMCPMC7853877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.