ArticleJCO global oncology2020
Survey of Third-Party Parenting Options Associated With Fertility Preservation Available to Patients With Cancer Around the Globe.
Article in JCO global oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perspectives of Young Women With Gynecologic Cancers on Fertility and Fertility Preservation: A Systematic Review.The oncologist · 2022Pooled it
- Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): a growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review).Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2018Pooled it
- The Fertility Market in Latin America and Brazil: A Narrative Review of Trends and Key Players.JBRA assisted reproduction · 2025Review
- Young Onset Colorectal Cancer.South Asian journal of cancer · 2024Article
- The Status of Fertility Preservation (FP) Insurance Mandates and Their Impact on Utilization and Access to Care.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Young-onset colorectal cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023Review
- Pediatric oncofertility care in limited versus optimum resource settings: results from 39 surveyed centers in Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- A synopsis of global frontiers in fertility preservation.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Review
- Installing oncofertility programs for breast cancer in limited versus optimum resource settings: Empirical data from 39 surveyed centers in Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- Assessment of Breast Cancer Management in Sub-Saharan Africa.JCO global oncology · 2021Article
- Installing oncofertility programs for common cancers in optimum resource settings (Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part II): a committee opinion.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Installing oncofertility programs for common cancers in limited resource settings (Repro-Can-OPEN Study): An extrapolation during the global crisis of Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020Article
- Oncofertility as a Universal Right and a Global Oncology Priority.JCO global oncology · 2020Article
- Survey of Fertility Preservation Options Available to Patients With Cancer Around the Globe.JCO global oncology · 2020Article
- Building Oncofertility Core Competency in Developing Countries: Experience From Egypt, Tunisia, Brazil, Peru, and Panama.JCO global oncology · 2020Article
- Barriers and Opportunities of Oncofertility Practice in Nine Developing Countries and the Emerging Oncofertility Professional Engagement Network.JCO global oncology · 2020Article
- Challenging iatrogenic menopause. Oncofertility programme in Poland - a single-centre experience.Przeglad menopauzalny = Menopause review · 2019Article
- Preserving fertility in female patients with hematological malignancies: the key points.Expert review of hematology · 2019Article
- Oncofertility: insights from IVF specialists-a worldwide web-based survey analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2019Article
- How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care.Human reproduction update · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2022
Authors and funding
63 authors at 20 institutions in 22 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: In the accompanying article, "Survey of Fertility Preservation Options Available to Patients With Cancer Around the Globe," we showed that specific fertility preservation services may not be offered at various sites around the world because of cultural and legal barriers. We assessed global and regional experiences as well as the legal status of third-party reproduction and adoption to serve as a comprehensive international data set and resource for groups that wish to begin oncofertility interventions. Methods: We provide data on the legalities of third-party assisted reproductive technologies and other family-building options in the 28 oncofertility-practicing countries surveyed. Results: We found regional and country differences that will be important in the development of tailored resources for physicians and for patient brochures that are sensitive to these local restrictions and cultural norms. Conclusion: Because many patients first consult Web-based materials, the formal assessment of the availability of these options provides members of the global oncofertility community with data to which they might otherwise not have ready access to better serve their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.