Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32259017›Full record

ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2020

Germline Testing for Patients With

Katherine Vlessis, Natasha Purington, Nicolette Chun, Sigurdis Haraldsdottir, James M Ford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Case report: olaparib use in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma withCold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2022
    Article
  4. Identification and Management of Pathogenic Variants in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 in a Tumor-Only Genomic Testing Program.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine VlessisSee the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations.
Natasha PuringtonSee the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations.ORCID 0000-0002-4936-5540
Nicolette ChunSee the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations.ORCID 0000-0002-7712-7777
Sigurdis HaraldsdottirSee the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations.
James M FordSee the Notes section for the full list of authors' affiliations.ORCID 0000-0002-2513-7025
Stanford University · US

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical & Translational Education and Research (Spectrum)UL1TR003142 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI O'HARA, RUTH M · 2019 to 2023
$45.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends germline testing for pathogenic

methodsWe retrospectively collected all Stanford patients with

resultsOf 164 participants, 51 (31.1%) had no recommendation for germline testing. Of the 97 available germline-testing results, 54 (55.7%) were positive for pathogenic

conclusionsOur study highlights the importance of provider education outside of the oncologic specialties typically associated with

Identifiers

PMID32259017
PMCPMC7043298
OpenAlexW2989426757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.