Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32258981›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2020

Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia.

Yuichi Takayama, Yuji Kaneoka, Atsuyuki Maeda, Takamasa Takahashi, Masahito Uji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuichi TakayamaDepartment of Surgery Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki-shi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7484-8480
Yuji KaneokaDepartment of Surgery Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki-shi Japan.
Atsuyuki MaedaDepartment of Surgery Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki-shi Japan.
Takamasa TakahashiDepartment of Surgery Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki-shi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2430-1839
Masahito UjiDepartment of Surgery Ogaki Municipal Hospital Ogaki-shi Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimA few studies comparing laparoscopic and open techniques have reported that open repair with mesh is the optimal operation for unilateral primary hernia. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) versus open mesh plug repair (MP) for bilateral primary inguinal hernia.

methodsThis was a retrospective study of 107 patients with bilateral primary inguinal hernia between January 2008 and December 2016. Of these patients, 49 underwent TAPP and 58 underwent MP. The surgical outcomes and the long-term outcomes using a questionnaire were compared between TAPP and MP.

resultsIn the TAPP group, the operation time was significantly longer (103 vs 91 minutes;

conclusionTAPP for bilateral primary inguinal hernia achieved better results than MP relative to postoperative pain and the use of medication for pain relief without increasing the complication and recurrence rates.

Indexed as

bilateral inguinal hernialaparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repairopen mesh plug repair

Identifiers

PMID32258981
PMCPMC7105845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.