Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32258979›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2020

Billroth-I vs Roux-en-Y after distal gastrectomy: A comparison of long-term nutritional status and survival rates from a large-scale multicenter cohort study.

Takahiro Kinoshita, Michitaka Honda, Atsushi Matsuki, Naoki Enomoto, Masaki Aizawa, Souya Nunobe, Hiroshi Yabusaki, Takayuki Abe, Naoki Hiki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Takahiro KinoshitaGastric Surgery Division National Cancer Center Hospital East Kashiwa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7365-8733
Michitaka HondaDepartment of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology Fukushima Medical University Fukushima Japan.
Atsushi MatsukiDepartment of Digestive Surgery Niigata Cancer Center Hospital Niigata Japan.
Naoki EnomotoDepartment of Surgery National Center for Global Health and Medicine Tokyo Japan.
Masaki AizawaDepartment of Digestive Surgery Niigata Cancer Center Hospital Niigata Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4682-5118
Souya NunobeDepartoment of Gastroenterological Surgery Cancer Institute Hospital Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3012-5632
Hiroshi YabusakiDepartment of Digestive Surgery Niigata Cancer Center Hospital Niigata Japan.
Takayuki AbeDepartment of Biostatistics School of Data Science Yokohama City University Yokohama Japan.
Naoki HikiDepartment of Surgery Kitasato University Sagamihara Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6857-8736
Niigata Cancer Center Hospital · JPFukushima Medical University · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPKitasato University · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNational Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPYokohama City University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal standard reconstruction procedure after distal gastrectomy is controversial. No large-scale persuasive clinical studies from long-term perspectives on this topic have yet been conducted. STUDY

designThis retrospective multicenter study analyzed a database of 2510 consecutive patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer who underwent distal gastrectomy followed by Billroth-I (B-I) or Roux-en-Y (R-Y) anastomosis from 2006 to 2012. After adjusting for 30 potential confounding factors using propensity score matching, we compared the body weight loss and other nutritional status for 5 years as primary outcomes between the two groups. We also investigated surgical outcomes, endoscopic findings, and long-term survival rates as secondary outcomes.

resultsAfter matching the inclusion criteria, 940 patients (470 in each group) were enrolled. There was no marked difference in the body weight loss and other nutritional indicators. The incidence of grade ≥3 postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification) or the incidence of gallstone formation was not markedly different between the two groups. The postoperative hospital stay after surgery was significantly longer, and the readmission rate was significantly higher in the R-Y group than in the B-I group. An endoscopic examination revealed no trends regarding the incidence and severity of gastritis or residual food in the remnant stomach. The 5-year overall survival rate was 92.6% in the B-I group and 91.8% in the R-Y group, with no significant difference (

conclusionsRoux-en-Y reconstruction may be nearly equal to Billroth-I with regard to the long-term nutritional perspectives.

Indexed as

Billroth‐Igastric cancernutritionRoux‐en‐Ysurvival

Identifiers

PMID32258979
PMCPMC7105836
OpenAlexW3004856926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.