ReviewCanadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur2020
Translational issues in precision medicine in neuropathic pain.
Review in Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Targeted Therapy for Orofacial Pain: A Novel Perspective for Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Optimizing and Accelerating the Development of Precision Pain Treatments for Chronic Pain: IMMPACT Review and Recommendations.The journal of pain · 2023Review
- Article
- Developmental mechanisms of CPSP: Clinical observations and translational laboratory evaluations.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2022Review
- Exploiting Injury-Induced Peripheral Opioid Receptor Changes in Novel Analgesic Development for Chronic Pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Pain Phenotypes in Rare Musculoskeletal and Neuromuscular Diseases.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Neuropathic pain remains poorly treated, with most new drugs falling through the translational gap. The traditional model of bench-to-bedside research has relied on identifying new mechanisms/targets in animal models and then developing clinical applications. Several have advocated bridging the translational gap by beginning with clinical observations and back-translating to animal models for further investigation of mechanisms. There is good evidence that phenotyping of patients through quantitative sensory testing can lead to improved treatment selection and hence improved patient outcomes. This practice has been widely adopted in clinical investigations, but its application in preclinical research is not mainstream. In this review, we retrospectively examine our historical rodent data sets with the aim of reconsidering drug effects on sensory neuronal endpoints, their alignment with clinical observations, and how these might guide future clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.