Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32258898›Full record

ArticleACS omega2020

Molecular Architect: A User-Friendly Workflow for Virtual Screening.

Eduardo H B Maia, Lucas Rolim Medaglia, Alisson Marques da Silva, Alex G Taranto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computational Study of Enzyme Inhibition.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  5. AnCurrent drug targets · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. In vitro and in silico assessment of new beta amino ketones with antiplasmodial activity.Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dehydrobufotenin extracted from the Amazonian toadThe journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eduardo H B MaiaLaboratório de Quêmica Farmaĉutica Medicinal, Universidade Federal de São João Del-Rei, Divinópolis 35501-296, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Lucas Rolim MedagliaUniversidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, Brazil.
Alisson Marques da SilvaCentro Federal de Educação Tecnológica de Minas Gerais, CEFET-MG, Campus Divinópolis, Divinópolis 35503-822, MG, Brazil.
Alex G TarantoLaboratório de Quêmica Farmaĉutica Medicinal, Universidade Federal de São João Del-Rei, Divinópolis 35501-296, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer-assisted drug design (CADD) methods have greatly contributed to the development of new drugs. Among CADD methodologies, virtual screening (VS) can enrich the compound collection with molecules that have the desired physicochemical and pharmacophoric characteristics that are needed to become drugs. Many free tools are available for this purpose, but they are difficult to use and do not have a graphical user interface. Furthermore, several free tools must be used to carry out the entire VS process, requiring the user to process the results of one software program so that they can be used in another program, adding a potential source of human error. Moreover, some software programs require knowledge of advanced computational skills, such as programming languages. This context has motivated us to develop Molecular Architect (MolAr). MolAr is a workflow with a simple and intuitive interface that acts in an integrated and automated form to perform the entire VS process, from protein preparation (homology modeling and protonation state) to virtual screening. MolAr carries out VS through AutoDock Vina, DOCK 6, or a consensus of the two. Two case studies were conducted to demonstrate the performance of MolAr. In the first study, the feasibility of using MolAr for DNA-ligand systems was assessed. Both AutoDock Vina and DOCK 6 showed good results in performing VS in DNA-ligand systems. However, the use of consensus virtual screening was able to enrich the results. According to the area under the ROC curve and the enrichment factors, consensus VS was better able to predict the positions of the active ligands. The second case study was performed on 8 targets from the DUD-E database and 10 active ligands for each target. The results demonstrated that using the final ligand conformation provided by AutoDock Vina as an input for DOCK 6 improved the DOCK 6 ROC curves by up to 42% in VS. These case studies demonstrated that MolAr is capable conducting the VS process and is an easy-to-use and effective tool. MolAr is available for download free of charge at http: //www.drugdiscovery.com.br/software/.

Identifiers

PMID32258898
PMCPMC7114615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.