Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32258881›Full record

ArticleACS omega2020

Enhanced Dissolution of Luteolin by Solid Dispersion Prepared by Different Methods: Physicochemical Characterization and Antioxidant Activity.

Sultan Alshehri, Syed Sarim Imam, Mohammad A Altamimi, Afzal Hussain, Faiyaz Shakeel, Ehab Elzayat, Kazi Mohsin, Mohamed Ibrahim, Fars Alanazi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sultan AlshehriDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Syed Sarim ImamDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammad A AltamimiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Afzal HussainDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Faiyaz ShakeelDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Ehab ElzayatDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Kazi MohsinDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Mohamed IbrahimDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Fars AlanaziDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Luteolin (LT) is a poorly soluble bioactive compound that suffered bioavailability problems after oral administration. Hence, the aim of the proposed research work was to formulate and investigate various solid dispersions (SDs) of LT in order to enhance its dissolution and bioactivity. LT-SD was prepared using polyethylene glycol 4000 (PEG 4000) as a carrier at the mass ratios of 1:1, 1:2, and 1:4. LT-SD was prepared using different methods including fusion (FU), solvent evaporation (SE), and microwave irradiation (MI) methods. The prepared LT-SD was duly characterized in terms of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), infrared (IR) spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and evaluated for dissolution and in vitro antioxidant activity. The results of DSC, XRD, SEM, IR, and NMR suggested the formation of LT-SD. After 90 min of the dissolution study, the results displayed that the % release of LT from prepared SD was significantly higher compared with the pure LT and its physical mixture dispersion (PMD). LT-SD prepared using the MI method displayed the maximum release of LT (i.e., 97.78 ± 4.41%) at a 1:2 mass ratio of LT:PEG 4000. The LT-SD prepared using the SE method displayed the maximum release of 93.78 ± 3.98% at a mass ratio of 1:4 of LT:PEG 4000. The SD prepared by the MI method showed enhanced dissolution due to higher aqueous solubility and the reduction of particle size. The solid-state characterization studies (DSC, XRD, SEM, IR, and NMR studies) suggested the morphological conversion of LT into the amorphous form from the crystalline state. The results of the antioxidant study revealed that the formation LT-SD displayed significantly higher radical scavenging activity than the pure LT. Therefore, SD obtained using PEG 4000 could be a potential strategy for maximizing the solubility, in vitro dissolution, and therapeutic efficacy of LT.

Identifiers

PMID32258881
PMCPMC7114142
OpenAlexW3010986703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.