Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32258789›Full record

ReviewPorto biomedical journal

The impact of folic acid supplementation on gestational and long term health: Critical temporal windows, benefits and risks.

Carla Silva, Elisa Keating, Elisabete Pinto

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Porto biomedical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Using FIGO Nutrition Checklist counselling in pregnancy: A review to support healthcare professionals.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carla SilvaFaculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Elisa KeatingDepartment of Biomedicine - Biochemistry Unit, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Elisabete PintoCBQF - Centre of Biotechnology and Fine Chemistry - School of Biotechnology, Portuguese Catholic University, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTCentre for Health Technology and Services Research · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

highlightsAssociations between FA supplementation in pregnancy and effects on offspring's NTDs, allergy/respiratory problems, cancer and behaviour problems as been studied.There is growing concern about the effects of excessive FA supplementation, whether in terms of doses or times of exposure.FA supplementation in the periconceptional period is protective against NTDs while in later periods it could be deleterious.A daily dose of 0.4 mg FA in the periconceptional period seems to be effective and safe. ABSTRACT: Maternal folic acid (FA) supplementation is one of the most popular nutritional interventions during pregnancy for its protective effect against neural tube defects (NTDs).The purposes of this review are: (a) to gather the current evidence regarding supplementation of maternal diet with FA and (b) to problematize the available literature in terms of dosages, critical temporal windows, and its potential benefits and risks.The expression (pregnancy OR fetus OR offspring OR mother) AND ("folic acid" AND supplementation) was searched on PubMed database, filtering for articles published from 2005 to 2014. Publications referring to FA supplementation during the periconceptional period or pregnancy in which there was a conclusion about the effects of isolated FA supplementation on pregnant woman, pregnancy or offspring were included. Of the initial 1182 papers, 109 fulfilled the inclusion criteria.The majority of the publications reported FA supplementation outcomes on offspring's health, with emphasis in NTDs, allergy/respiratory problems, cancer and behaviour problems. Some inconsistency is observed on the impact of FA supplementation on different outcomes, except for NTDs. It is also visible an increased concern about the impact of excessive supplementation, either in terms of doses or exposure's duration.In conclusion, there is a growing interest in FA supplementation issues. The protective effect of FA supplementation over NTDs has been confirmed, being the periconceptional period a critical window, and it is frequently suggested that allergy/respiratory outcomes arise from (excessive) FA supplementation particularly later in pregnancy. Further research on critical doses and time of exposure should be conducted.

Indexed as

Folic acidOffspringPericonceptionalPregnancySupplementation

Identifiers

PMID32258789
PMCPMC6806748
OpenAlexW2736069857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.