ArticleJPRAS open2020
Anatomically accurate 3D modelling and printing in a case of obstetric brachial plexus injury.
Article in JPRAS open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Obstetric brachial plexus injury is reported in 0.42 per 1000 births in UK and Ireland and are associated with a reduction in quality of life for the patient and their carers. In this report we describe the first use of a patient specific, anatomically accurate 3D model as a communication tool in the treatment of a complex case of posterior shoulder subluxation secondary to glenohumeral deformity resulting from obstetric brachial plexus injury. The use of 3D models for surgical planning is associated with decreased operating time and reduction of intra-operative blood loss, whilst their use in patient education increases patient understanding. In this case all surgeons surveyed agreed that it was useful and will use 3D modelling to improve consent processes and to conceptualise novel techniques for complex cases in future. This highly reproducible, low cost technique may be adapted to a variety of upper limb reconstructive surgeries, and as the resolution of image acquisition and additive manufacturing capabilities increase so too do the potential applications of this precise 3D printed surgical adjunct.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.