Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32258181›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2020

An Expert Consensus Statement on the Management of Large Chondral and Osteochondral Defects in the Patellofemoral Joint.

Jorge Chahla, Betina B Hinckel, Adam B Yanke, Jack Farr, Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA) Group, William D Bugbee, James L Carey, Brian J Cole, Dennis C Crawford, James E Fleischli and 21 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Treatment Options for Patellofemoral Arthritis.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jorge ChahlaInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Betina B HinckelInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Adam B YankeInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jack FarrInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA) Group
William D BugbeeInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
James L CareyInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Brian J ColeInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Dennis C CrawfordInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
James E FleischliInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Alan GetgoodInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Andreas H GomollInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Simon GortzInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Allan E GrossInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Deryk G JonesInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Aaron J KrychInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Christian LattermannInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Bert R MandelbaumInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Peter R MandtInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Tom MinasInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Raffy MirzayanInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Timothy S MologneInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
John D PolouskyInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Matthew T ProvencherInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Scott A RodeoInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Oleg SafirInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Seth Lawrence ShermanInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Eric D StraussInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Sabrina M StricklandInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Christopher J WahlInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Riley J WilliamsInvestigation performed at Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush and the Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Rush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCartilage lesions of the patellofemoral joint constitute a frequent abnormality. Patellofemoral conditions are challenging to treat because of complex biomechanics and morphology. PURPOSE: To develop a consensus statement on the functional anatomy, indications, donor graft considerations, surgical treatment, and rehabilitation for the management of large chondral and osteochondral defects in the patellofemoral joint using a modified Delphi technique. STUDY

designConsensus statement.

methodsA working group of 4 persons generated a list of statements related to the functional anatomy, indications, donor graft considerations, surgical treatment, and rehabilitation for the management of large chondral and osteochondral defects in the patellofemoral joint to form the basis of an initial survey for rating by a group of experts. The Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA) expert group (composed of 28 high-volume cartilage experts) was surveyed on 3 occasions to establish a consensus on the statements. In addition to assessing agreement for each included statement, experts were invited to propose additional statements for inclusion or to suggest modifications of existing statements with each round. Predefined criteria were used to refine statement lists after each survey round. Statements reaching a consensus in round 3 were included within the final consensus document.

resultsA total of 28 experts (100% response rate) completed 3 rounds of surveys. After 3 rounds, 36 statements achieved a consensus, with over 75% agreement and less than 20% disagreement. A consensus was reached in 100.00% of the statements relating to functional anatomy of the patellofemoral joint, 88.24% relating to surgical indications, 100.00% relating to surgical technical aspects, and 100.00% relating to rehabilitation, with an overall consensus of 95.5%.

conclusionThis study established a strong expert consensus document relating to the functional anatomy, surgical indications, donor graft considerations for osteochondral allografts, surgical technical aspects, and rehabilitation concepts for the management of large chondral and osteochondral defects in the patellofemoral joint. Further research is required to clinically validate the established consensus statements and better understand the precise indications for surgery as well as which techniques and graft processing/preparation methods should be used based on patient- and lesion-specific factors.

Indexed as

allograftcartilageconsensusDelphiosteochondralpatellofemoral

Identifiers

PMID32258181
PMCPMC7099674
OpenAlexW3013810081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.