Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32258074›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of clinical cases2020

Clinical course of percutaneous cholecystostomies: A cross-sectional study.

Sadettin Er, Hüseyin Berkem, Sabri Özden, Birkan Birben, Erdinç Çetinkaya, Mesut Tez, Bülent Cavit Yüksel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of clinical cases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Factors affecting interval cholecystectomy and mortality in percutaneous cholecystostomy patients.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sadettin ErDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06100, Turkey.
Hüseyin BerkemDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06100, Turkey.
Sabri ÖzdenDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06100, Turkey.
Birkan BirbenDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06100, Turkey.
Erdinç ÇetinkayaDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06100, Turkey.
Mesut TezDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06100, Turkey. mesuttez@yahoo.com.
Bülent Cavit YükselDepartment of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06100, Turkey.
Ankara Numune Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough cholecystectomy is the standard treatment modality, it has been shown that perioperative mortality is approaching 19% in critical and elderly patients. Percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) can be considered as a safer option with a significantly lower complication rate in these patients.

aimTo assess the clinical course of acute cholecystitis (AC) in patients we treated with PC.

methodsThe study included 82 patients with Grade I, II or III AC according to the Tokyo Guidelines 2018 (TG18) and treated with PC. The patients' demographic and clinical features, laboratory parameters, and radiological findings were retrospectively obtained from their medical records.

resultsEighty-two patients, 45 (54.9%) were male, and the median age was 76 (35-98) years. According to TG18, 25 patients (30.5%) had Grade I, 34 (41.5%) Grade II, and 23 (28%) Grade III AC. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status score was III or more in 78 patients (95.1%). The patients, who had been treated with PC, were divided into two groups: discharged patients and those who died in hospital. The groups statistically significantly differed only concerning the ASA score (

conclusionFor high clinical success in AC treatment, PC is recommended for high-risk patients with moderate-severe AC according to TG18, elderly patients, and especially those with ASA scores of ≥ III. According to our results, PC, a safe, effective and minimally invasive treatment, should be preferred in cases suffering from AC with high risk of mortality associated with cholecystectomy.

Indexed as

AcuteCatheter ablationCholecystectomyCholecystitisCholecystostomyMorbidityMortality

Identifiers

PMID32258074
PMCPMC7103974
OpenAlexW3013317149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.