SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2020
The Use of Meta-Analysis for the Measurement of Animal Disease Burden: Losses Due to Clinical Mastitis as an Example.
Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mastitis-Associated Bacterial Isolates and Antimicrobial Resistance in a Single Dairy Herd in the Akmola Region, Kazakhstan.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Milk Disposition Kinetics, Residue and Efficacy of Rifaximin After Intramammary Administration in Lactating Cow.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Targeting the Gut-Mammary Axis for Understanding Mastitis Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Strategies.Veterinary sciences · 2025Review
- The burden of antimicrobial resistance in livestock: A framework to estimate its impact within the Global Burden of Animal Diseases programme.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Current Trends in Artificial Intelligence and Bovine Mastitis Research: A Bibliometric Review Approach.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Management Practices of Bovine Mastitis and Milk Quality on Egyptian Dairies.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
- The Marginal Abatement Cost of Antimicrobials for Dairy Cow Mastitis: A Bioeconomic Optimization Perspective.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Etiology of severe mastitis in French dairy herds.PloS one · 2023Article
- Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Assessing Social Acceptance of Strategies to Reduce Antimicrobial Use in the French Dairy Industry.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Control Program AgainstFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022Article
- Aptamer-based diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in animals: Current potential and challenges.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021Review
- Evaluation of haemoparasite andInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The literature contains an extensive panel of studies focusing on the costs of animal diseases. The losses of an agriculture holding can be influenced by many factors since farming is a complex system and diseases are closely interrelated. Meta-analysis can be used to detect effects (i.e., change in clinical mastitis losses here) across studies and to identify factors that may influence those effects. This includes the external validity of the published study results with regard to the input parameters and the internal validity of the study, particularly how other diseases related to the target disease were accounted for. Mixed-effect meta-regressions were performed to estimate the mean clinical mastitis losses per case across the literature and to elucidate to what extent clinical mastitis losses are influenced by (i) general factors, such as etiology; (ii) the types of losses that contribute to the total mastitis losses; and (iii) prices. In total, 82 observations from nine studies were included in the meta-analysis to assess mean clinical mastitis losses per case. The multivariate meta-regression showed that etiology significantly influenced the clinical mastitis loss per case. The mean loss was determined to be €224 per case for all published etiologies. In detail, mean losses equalled €457 and €101 per case of clinical mastitis due to gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, respectively, and €428 and €74 per case of clinical mastitis due to
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.