Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32258048›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2020

Spontaneous Embedding of DNA Mismatches Within the RNA:DNA Hybrid of CRISPR-Cas9.

Brandon P Mitchell, Rohaine V Hsu, Marco A Medrano, Nehemiah T Zewde, Yogesh B Narkhede, Giulia Palermo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Electronic Structure of Genome Editors from the First Principles.Electronic structure (Bristol, England) · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. An overview of structural approaches to study therapeutic RNAs.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Establishing the allosteric mechanism in CRISPR-Cas9.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brandon P MitchellDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
Rohaine V HsuDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
Marco A MedranoDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
Nehemiah T ZewdeDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
Yogesh B NarkhedeDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
Giulia PalermoDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
University of California, Riverside · US

Funding

Salk Institute Cancer Training GrantT32CA009370 · NCI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI Diana Clare Hargreaves, Jan Karlseder · 1986 to 2026
$8.6M
Discovery of Biomarkers for Age-Related Macular DegenerationR01EY027440 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE · PI VULLEV, VALENTINE · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009370NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9 is the forefront technology for editing the genome. In this system, the Cas9 protein is programmed with guide RNAs to process DNA sequences that match the guide RNA forming an RNA:DNA hybrid structure. However, the binding of DNA sequences that do not fully match the guide RNA can limit the applicability of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome editing, resulting in the so-called off-target effects. Here, molecular dynamics is used to probe the effect of DNA base pair mismatches within the RNA:DNA hybrid in CRISPR-Cas9. Molecular simulations revealed that the presence of mismatched pairs in the DNA at distal sites with respect to the Protospacer Adjacent Motif (PAM) recognition sequence induces an extended opening of the RNA:DNA hybrid, leading to novel interactions established by the unwound nucleic acids and the protein counterpart. On the contrary, mismatched pairs upstream of the RNA:DNA hybrid are rapidly incorporated within the heteroduplex, with minor effect on the protein-nucleic acid interactions. As a result, mismatched pairs at PAM distal ends interfere with the activation of the catalytic HNH domain, while mismatches fully embedded in the RNA:DNA do not affect the HNH dynamics and enable its activation to cleave the DNA. These findings provide a mechanistic understanding to the intriguing experimental evidence that PAM distal mismatches hamper a proper function of HNH, explaining also why mismatches within the heteroduplex are much more tolerated. This constitutes a step forward in understanding off-target effects in CRISPR-Cas9, which encourages novel structure-based engineering efforts aimed at preventing the onset of off-target effects.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas9molecular dynamicsoff-target effectsprotein-nucleic acid interactionsRNA:DNA hybrid

Identifiers

PMID32258048
PMCPMC7093078
OpenAlexW3011718018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.