ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2020
Progress Toward Identifying Exact Proxies for Predicting Response to Immunotherapies.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed.
- DSCC1 Identified as Promising Tumor Biomarker and Potential Therapeutic Target Through Comprehensive Multi-omics Analysis and Experimental Validation.Molecular biotechnology · 2026Article
- Multi-omics insights into spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis: integrating genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and the microbiome for immunological and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Comprehensive analysis of BIRC5: from pan-cancer analysis to experimental validation.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- A pan-cancer analysis of the oncogenic and immunological roles of THOC3 in human cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- CD99 is a potential diagnostic and immunological biomarker in pan-cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Analysis of the prognostic and immune role of MCM6 in pan-cancer and experimental validation in lung adenocarcinoma cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Insight Into the Significance of CD8+ Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- Pan-cancer analysis of oncogenic role of MAGOH and experiment validation in hepatocellular carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pan‑cancer analysis of oncogene SFXN1 to identify its prognostic and immunological roles in lung adenocarcinoma.Oncology reports · 2025Article
- Transforming Cancer Care: Genomic Profiling, AI, and Next-Generation Drug Delivery Systems.Current genomics · 2025Review
- Pan-cancer analysis reveals ELFN1 as a novel prognostic biomarker and immunotherapeutic target associated with tumor microenvironment remodeling and promoting malignant phenotypes in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Tubulin alpha-1b chain was identified as a prognosis and immune biomarker in pan-cancer combing with experimental validation in breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Pancancer analysis of the prognostic and immunological role of FANCD2: a potential target for carcinogenesis and survival.BMC medical genomics · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analysis indicated that NDE1 is a potential biomarker for pan-cancer and promotes bladder cancer progression.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Insight into the significance of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in squamous cell lung cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Pan-cancer analysis and single-cell analysis reveals FAM110B as a potential target for survival and immunotherapy.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analysis of the role of ICOS ( CD278 ) in pan-cancer prognosis and immunotherapy.BMC cancer · 2023Article
- Comprehensive Pan-Cancer Analysis of KIF18A as a Marker for Prognosis and Immunity.Biomolecules · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical value and utility of checkpoint inhibitors, a drug class targeting adaptive immune suppression pathways (PD-1, PDL-1, and CTLA-4), is growing rapidly and maintains status of a landmark achievement in oncology. Their efficacy has transformed life expectancy in multiple deadly cancer types (melanoma, lung cancer, renal/urothelial carcinoma, certain colorectal cancers, lymphomas, etc.). Despite significant clinical development efforts, therapeutic indication of approved checkpoint inhibitors are not as wide as the oncology community and patients would like them to be, potentially bringing into question their universal efficacy across tumor histologies. With the main goal of expanding immunotherapy applications, identifying of biomarkers to accurately predict therapeutic response and treatment related side-effects are a paramount need in the field. Specificities surrounding checkpoint inhibitors in clinic, such as unexpected tumor response patterns (pseudo- and hyper-progression), late responders, as well as specific immune mediated toxicities, complicate the management of patients. They stem from the complexities and dynamics of the tumor/host immune interactions, as well as baseline tumor biology. Search for clinically effective biomarkers therefore calls for a holistic approach, rather than implementation of a single analyte. The goal is to achieve dynamic and comprehensive acquisition, analyses and interpretation of immunological and biologic information about the tumor and the immune system, and to compute these parameters into an actionable, maximally predictive value at the individual patient level. Limitation delaying swift incorporation of validated immuno-oncology biomarkers span from standardized biospecimens acquisition and processing, selection of proficient biomarker discovery and validation methods, to establishing multidisciplinary consortiums and data sharing platforms. Multi-disciplinary efforts have already yielded some approved (PDL-1 and MSI-status) and other advanced tests (TMB, neoantigen pattern, and TIL infiltration rate). Importantly, clinical trial taskforces now recognize the imperative of the biomarker-driven trial design and execution, to enable translating biomarker discoveries into the clinical setting. This will ensure we utilize the "conspiracy" between the peripheral and intra-tumoral dynamic markers in shaping responses to checkpoint blockade, for the ultimate patient benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.