Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32257852›Full record

ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2020

Current and future trends in men's health clinics.

Justin J Houman, Sriram V Eleswarapu, Jesse N Mills

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Men's health care: concept analysis.Investigacion y educacion en enfermeria · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Testosterone replacement therapy in the era of telemedicine.International journal of impotence research · 2022
    Review
  11. Informing California's Plan to Enhance HIV Screening in the Ending the HIV Epidemic Initiative.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Justin J HoumanDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sriram V EleswarapuDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jesse N MillsDepartment of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Men's health is a unique field that requires a multi-disciplinary approach to appropriately treat the full spectrum of men's health needs. Given that interest in men's health is relatively new, the definition of a men's health clinic continues to evolve. Originally conceived as testosterone replacement centers, men's health clinics are increasingly understood to encompass male endocrine, surgical, urologic, physical performance, and psychological issues. As interest in men's health continues to grow, it is important to focus on the field's future, including pharmacies, telemedicine, and the diffusion of healthcare.

Indexed as

currentfutureMen’s health

Identifiers

PMID32257852
PMCPMC7108990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.