ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology2020
Analgesic efficacy of a single-dose, intraoperative, intra-articular morphine application in ACL reconstruction.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Research progress on early postoperative pain management strategies after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the mainstay treatment for the symptomatic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Postoperative rehabilitation is the key main factor in successful surgical outcome but, the postoperative pain is a major obstacle to achieve good postoperative rehabilitation. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of intra-articular morphine (IAMO) with normal saline [control group (C)] for postoperative pain control in the ACL reconstruction knees.
methodsPatients who underwent ACL reconstruction during 2017-2019 were included, prospectively, from Khon Kaen hospital and randomized into 2 groups: IAMO group and the control group (C). After surgery, all patients received the same rehabilitation protocols. The results were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), following the spinal block anesthesia at 6, 12,18 and 24 hours. Time to first analgesic request, range of motion and adverse effects were recorded.
resultsForty patients were included and twenty were designated to the IAMO group. The mean age was 25.3±7.6 years and 80 percent of the patients were males. The IAMO group had lower VAS scores at the 12 and 24 hour postoperative periods [greatest variance at 12 hours (4.7±1.7 vs 5.8±1.6)]. In the IAMO group, time to first analgesic request was longer and morphine consumption was less, but these were not statistically significant. No complications were observed in both groups.
conclusionsThe trend of VAS in the IAMO group was lower than in the control group, especially at 12 hours after surgery with no statistically significant differences. From this study and with the advantages of IAMO after ACL reconstruction, IAMO is useful in ACL reconstruction patients without complications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.