ArticleCureus2020
Optimizing Alignment Parameters During Craniocervical Stabilization and Fusion: A Technical Note.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Experimental study of patient-specific three-dimensional-printed drill guide-assisted CZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- Craniocervical instability in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: outcomes analysis following occipito-cervical fusion.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Reference values of four measures of craniocervical stability using upright dynamic magnetic resonance imaging.La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- Assessment of patients with a Chiari malformation type I.Brain & spine · 2022Article
- Cervicogenic Dizziness Associated With Craniocervical Instability: A Case Report.Journal of medical cases · 2021Article
- An investigation of craniocervical stability post-condylectomy.Surgical neurology international · 2021Review
- The Neurosurgical Intraoperative Checklist for Surgery of the Craniocervical Junction and Spine.Cureus · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proper craniocervical alignment during craniocervical reduction, stabilization, and fusion optimizes cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow through the foramen magnum, establishes the appropriate "gaze angle", avoids dysphagia and dyspnea, and, most importantly, normalizes the clival-axial angle (CXA) to reduce ventral brainstem compression. To illustrate the metrics of reduction that include CXA, posterior occipital cervical angle, orbital-axial or "gaze angle", and mandible-axial angle, we present a video illustration of a patient presenting with signs and symptoms of the cervical medullary syndrome along with concordant radiographic findings of craniocervical instability as identified on dynamic imaging and through assessment of the CXA, Harris, and Grabb-Oakes measurements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.