ArticleCureus2020
Intraoperative and Postoperative Complications Following Open, Laparoscopic, and Hysteroscopic Myomectomies in Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Exploring Surgical Strategies for Uterine Fibroid Treatment: A Comprehensive Review of Literature on Open and Minimally Invasive Approaches.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- The effects of laparoscopic myomectomy and open surgery on uterine myoma patients' postoperative immuno-inflammatory responses, endocrine statuses, and prognoses: a comparative study.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to broaden our knowledge regarding the complications of myomectomy to better understand how to prevent them from occurring. Another aim was to compare surgical approaches, especially with the current research limitations surrounding this topic in Saudi Arabia. Methods This retrospective study was conducted in a cohort of 263 women who underwent surgical myomectomy, without any exclusion criteria. We used our hospital electronic medical records program called Phoenix to obtain all the data regarding clinical presentation, intraoperative findings, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and hospital stay, and then statistically analyzed these findings. Results Results were divided depending on the type of surgery. The mean age of open, laparoscopic, and hysteroscopic myomectomy groups were 40.82 years, 42.05 years, and 44.43 years, respectively. There were 213 (80.98%) open, 34 (12.93%) laparoscopic, and 16 (6.09%) hysteroscopic myomectomies. The most common indication in all groups was bleeding. The mean estimated blood loss and duration of surgery for open, laparoscopic, and hysteroscopic myomectomy groups were: 576.13 mL and 103.05 min, 333.21 mL and 56.91 min, and 306.29 mL and 104.19 min, respectively. The total complication rate for each group was 10.8% in open, 2.94% in laparoscopic, and 6.25% in hysteroscopic myomectomies. Conclusion Laparoscopy is considered the more effective option for myomectomy than both laparotomy and hysterectomy in terms of surgery duration, hospital stay, and prevalence of complications. However, it is a technically challenging operation that requires experienced surgeons to perform. Based on the information we gathered, we recommend our institute to implement laparoscopy instead of laparotomy myomectomy, which is the current standard procedure in our hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.