Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32257543›Full record

ArticleAging and disease2020

Impaired Frontoparietal Connectivity in Traumatic Individuals with Disorders of Consciousness: A Dynamic Brain Network Analysis.

Min Wu, Fali Li, Yuehao Wu, Tieying Zhang, Jian Gao, Peng Xu, Benyan Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging and disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Min Wu1Department of Neurology & Brain Medical Centre, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Fali Li2The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, Key Lab for NeuroInformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Yuehao Wu1Department of Neurology & Brain Medical Centre, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Tieying Zhang1Department of Neurology & Brain Medical Centre, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Jian Gao3Department of Rehabilitation, Hangzhou Hospital of Zhejiang Armed Police Corps, Hangzhou, China.
Peng Xu2The Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, Key Lab for NeuroInformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Benyan Luo1Department of Neurology & Brain Medical Centre, First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang University · CNZhejiang Police College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in neuroimaging have demonstrated that patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC) may retain residual consciousness through activation of a complex functional brain network. However, an understanding of the hierarchy of residual consciousness and dynamic network connectivity in DOC patients is lacking. This study aimed to investigate residual consciousness and the dynamics of neural processing in DOC patients. We included 42 patients with DOC, categorized by aetiology. Event-related potentials combined with time-varying electroencephalography networks were used to probe affective consciousness in DOC and examine the related network mechanisms. The results showed an obvious frontal P3a component among patients in minimally conscious state (MCS), while a prominent N1 was observed in unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS). No late positive potential (LPP) was detected in these patients. Next, we divided the results by aetiology. Patients with nontraumatic injury presented an obvious frontal P3a response compared to those with traumatic injury. With respect to the dynamic network mechanism, patients with UWS, both with and without trauma, exhibited impaired frontoparietal network connectivity during the middle to late emotion processing period (P3a and LPP). Surprisingly, unconscious post-traumatic patients had an evident deficit in top-down connectivity. This, it appears that early automatic sensory identification is preserved in UWS and that exogenous attention was preserved even in MCS. However, high-level cognitive abilities were severely attenuated in unconscious patients. We also speculate that reduced frontoparietal connectivity may be useful as a biomarker to distinguish patients in an MCS from those with UWS given the same aetiology.

Indexed as

consciousnessevent-related potentialsfrontoparietal networktraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID32257543
PMCPMC7069467
OpenAlexW3012344894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.