ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2020
Primary care perspectives on implementation of clinical trial recruitment.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An international Delphi survey and consensus meeting to define the core outcome set for trigeminal neuralgia clinical trials.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Real-time evaluation and adaptation to facilitate rapid recruitment in a large, prospective cohort study.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Randomised clinical trial research within Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander primary health services: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2021Trial
- General Practitioners (GP) experiences in managing patients in clinical trials conducted by non-GP specialists: An exploratory qualitative study.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Is there a relationship between attitudes of general practitioners/family doctors and attitudes of their patients regarding industry-sponsored clinical investigations? A cross-sectional survey in a convenience sample of doctors and patients across nine European countries.Croatian medical journal · 2024Article
- Involving patients and clinicians in the development of a randomised clinical trial protocol to assess spinal manual therapy versus nerve root injection for patients with lumbar radiculopathy: a patient and public involvement project to inform the SALuBRITY trial design.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Evaluating adoption and reach in a pragmatic randomized trial of community paramedicine for intermediate acuity patient care.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024Article
- Primary care provider perspectives on a planned multi-cancer early detection test clinical trial.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2023Article
- Clinical trial recruitment in primary care: exploratory factor analysis of a questionnaire to measure barriers and facilitators to primary care providers' involvement.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Short-acting βBMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Observational
- Accelerating Cancer Patient Recruitment Through a Mobile Application (Clinical Trial Finder).Cancer informatics · 2022Article
- "There's not much we can do…" researcher-level barriers to the inclusion of underrepresented participants in translational research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Options for Meaningful Engagement in Clinical Research for Busy Frontline Clinicians.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Article
- Referral to Digital Parent Training in Primary Care: Facilitators and Barriers.Clinical practice in pediatric psychology · 2020Article
- "Pushed to Their Limits": Health Care Provider Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing a Mind-Body and Activity Program for Older Adults With Chronic Pain in a Community Clinic for the Underserved.Family & community healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPoor clinical trial (CT) recruitment is a significant barrier to translating basic science discoveries into medical practice. Improving support for primary care provider (PCP) referral of patients to CTs may be an important part of the solution. However, implementing CT referral support in primary care is not only technically challenging, but also presents challenges at the person and organization levels.
methodsThe objectives of this study were (1) to characterize provider and clinical supervisor attitudes and perceptions regarding CT research, recruitment, and referrals in primary care and (2) to identify perceived workflow strategies and facilitators relevant to designing a technology-supported primary care CT referral program. Focus groups were conducted with PCPs, directors, and supervisors.
resultsAnalysis indicated widespread support for the intrinsic scientific value of CTs, while at the same time deep concerns regarding protecting patient well-being, perceived loss of control when patients participate in trials, concern about the impact of point-of-care referrals on clinic workflow, the need for standard processes, and the need for CT information that enables referring providers to quickly confirm that the burdens are justified by the benefits at both patient and provider levels. PCP suggestions pertinent to implementing a CT referral decision support system are reported.
conclusionThe results from this work contribute to developing an implementation approach to support increased referral of patients to CTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.