ArticleRoyal Society open science2020
Robust subspace methods for outlier detection in genomic data circumvents the curse of dimensionality.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- LD-informed deep learning for Alzheimer's gene loci detection using WGS data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Extracellular Vesicle Protein Expression in Doped Bioactive Glasses: Further Insights Applying Anomaly Detection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Robust SNP-based prediction of rheumatoid arthritis through machine-learning-optimized polygenic risk score.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Stability of sensorimotor network sculpts the dynamic repertoire of resting state over lifespan.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- The AI for Scientific Discovery NetworkPatterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Review
- LD-informed deep learning for Alzheimer's gene loci detection using WGS data.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The application of machine learning to inference problems in biology is dominated by supervised learning problems of regression and classification, and unsupervised learning problems of clustering and variants of low-dimensional projections for visualization. A class of problems that have not gained much attention is detecting outliers in datasets, arising from reasons such as gross experimental, reporting or labelling errors. These could also be small parts of a dataset that are functionally distinct from the majority of a population. Outlier data are often identified by considering the probability density of normal data and comparing data likelihoods against some threshold. This classical approach suffers from the curse of dimensionality, which is a serious problem with omics data which are often found in very high dimensions. We develop an outlier detection method based on structured low-rank approximation methods. The objective function includes a regularizer based on neighbourhood information captured in the graph Laplacian. Results on publicly available genomic data show that our method robustly detects outliers whereas a density-based method fails even at moderate dimensions. Moreover, we show that our method has better clustering and visualization performance on the recovered low-dimensional projection when compared with popular dimensionality reduction techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.