Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32257289›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2020

Mapping the nature of distress raised by patients with high-grade glioma and their family caregivers: a descriptive longitudinal study.

Jennifer Philip, Anna Collins, Stacey Panozzo, Jane Staker, Michael Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Benefits of supportive strategies for carers of people with high-grade glioma: a systematic review : Strategies for addressing the needs of high-grade glioma carers.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Impact of consultation recordings on patient-reported outcomes in patients with brain tumors: a parallel randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. "Not me!" a qualitative, vignette-based study of nurses' and physicians' reactions to spiritual distress on neuro-oncological units.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer PhilipDepartment of Medicine, Eastern Hill Campus, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3312-0645
Anna CollinsDepartment of Medicine, Eastern Hill Campus, University of Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Stacey PanozzoVCCC Palliative Medicine Research Group, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Jane StakerDepartment of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michael MurphyDepartment of Neurosurgery, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew supportive and palliative care interventions have been described for people with high-grade glioma (HGG) and their caregivers. A structured intervention, I-CoPE, which includes regular screening of patients' and caregivers' needs, was delivered as a pilot study in a tertiary neuro-oncological unit. This study prospectively described the severity and content of key concerns raised by patients and their caregivers in the 3 months following a diagnosis of HGG.

methodsConsecutive patients and caregivers were screened for distress longitudinally using the Distress Thermometer at 3 time points. Exploration of the issues raised during screening was undertaken by the care coordinator and the issues documented. This documentation was subsequently audited to map patterns and nature of distress. The key reasons underlying distress and responses offered were grouped thematically and summarized using descriptive statistics.

resultsThirty-two patients and 31 caregivers were recruited and underwent screening. At diagnosis, 87% of caregivers (n = 27) and 60% of patients (n = 19) reported distress scores meeting clinical significance. The predominant concerns reported by patients during screening related to existential issues such as fear of dying, whereas caregivers were more focused on practical caring responsibilities. Over time, the reasons for distress changed to include more physical health concerns for patients and more psychological concerns for caregivers.

conclusionsThis prospective longitudinal descriptive study revealed that following a new diagnosis of HGG, patients and caregivers had changing needs for support and fluctuating distress, mirroring the illness trajectory. Palliative care needs were apparent from diagnosis, and early integration of palliative care should be considered.

Indexed as

caregivershigh-grade gliomamixed-methods researchpalliative carepsychosocial screeningsupportive care

Identifiers

PMID32257289
PMCPMC7104884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.